So I changed my car.

Soldato
Joined
26 Mar 2006
Posts
11,658
Location
United Kingdom
Well, after looking at countless estate cars I finally bit the bullet and bought one. I looked at many estates, and then narrowed it down to a few.

My narrowed down list was;

Audi A4 TDI 1.9TDI
Skoda Octavia VRS
BMW 320d
Subaru Forester
Honda Accord Tourer

Having spent countless hours on the internet reading up on all these cars and asking for advice here. I was mainly interested in the A4 2.0TDI Sline, yet I only wanted to spend £3k ex my Yaris T-Sport on top. I read that the 2 Litre engines be it 140 or 170 variants had many problems, injector seals/cambelt/waterpumps?. Since I did not exceed 10k miles per year there wasn't really a need for me to get a diesel.

The Skoda Octavia as much as I liked the look of it, I couldn't get past the badge.

Now the BMW 320d, really liked the look of these as well. Again problems, the swirl flap plastics disintegrating, I just couldn't risk it. To be honest I wanted a japanese car again.

The Honda Accord ticked all the boxes for me, excellent engine's but I did look at the 2.2CDTI however a lot were high mileage's and weren't in the best of conditions. I didn't think the car would be too big, but it was like a barge. I drove my cousins 2.0l petrol although the engine is good it just didn't give me what I wanted. The tourer is heavier so it felt quite lacking to it's saloon counterpart.

Then one evening I just thought to myself, why not look at the old Subaru Foresters. They were big 4x4 chunky box on wheels. Excellent. I wasn't too fussed about the performance or image at this point. I just needed an estate, then came the models. Which shall I go for? The UK Spec S-Turbo or the Import with 250bhp. Now you might be wondering, why look at diesels then a heavy petrol drinking japanese performance motor. Well, I thought to myself if I'm going to go for an estate, might as well be something quick. Until I read up on the heavy maintenance costs of a Turbo.

I was going to view an import one nearby it was quite cheap but wasn't in the best of nick. I spoke to the owner if he had done the cambelt/waterpump but he wasn't sure. That was asked, because of advice from here (thanks Kostas). He did have the car for several years and said it was running fine. Yet I wasn't confident so I gave it a miss.

So there I am in a dilemma, should I just give up my search or just get any estate car. Now I wasn't fussed about performance, my requirements had changed as I wanted a 4x4 after going from front wheel drive, and having it driven in the snow I didn't enjoy the experience. I really enjoyed the Yaris, it was good on fuel and a fun car to push to the limit, yet on long distance journeys it was tiring, sometimes I did not feel safe in it. I was just so light, and because they're getting common as chips where I am, I was wanting a change.

So I had one last bash for a 4x4 estate. Looked at Volvo V70R AWD. I was out of my debths them things do something like 15mpg urban, lol couldn't afford it. And the word Lolvo kept going around in my head.

So this time I thought ok, I'll go a little less on bootspace, it's not too important, I can't always fold the seats down. Subaru Impreza non-turbo I thought, l'll try find a good one. Well I was lucky, I found one. It's a 2003 awd as standard and looked appealing to me. FSH including a cam belt change at 60k. It's done 74k and in quite good nick. It also came with a unequal manifold/decat/big loud exhaust which is sort of doing my nut in now. But for what the car is I quite like it.

It's not the fastest of the bunch or the most economical. 15.05/Litres has given me 85miles so far, reserve hasn't come on, and I've been driving like a granny. I am getting people wanting to give it a go on the roads even though it does not look like a WRX/STI with a big scoop on the bonnet. Ignoring them is the best way before I embarrass myself. :o

Compared to my Yaris, what a difference. Ok ok, it has the cheap plastic interior, but finally the dials are in front of me and not to the side. The seats are more supportive and the car generally feels more planted. I actually have thought why have I gone without AWD for this long. It just feels really secure. I plan on having it for a while, it's got excellent bootspace when the seats are folded, even when they're up it's not too bad.

Anyway sorry for the long read here are some pictures.

img1974q.jpg

img1975b.jpg

img1976sk.jpg

img1977e.jpg
 
[TW]Fox;22111170 said:
Non Turbo... doesn't that mean it has about 120bhp but because of the 4wd does about 20mpg?

Pretty much. I couldn't afford the Turbo, the insurance was too expensive for me. Though it does feel faster then that. It is shocking economy wise. Does let the car down in that department.
 
Pretty much. I couldn't afford the Turbo, the insurance was too expensive for me. Though it does feel faster then that. It is shocking economy wise. Does let the car down in that department.

How large was the difference in insurance between a turbo out of interest? I imagine that 'young driver', 'modified' and 'Impreza' would set the alarm bells ringing for insurance company with or without a turbo.
 
How large was the difference in insurance between a turbo out of interest? I imagine that 'young driver', 'modified' and 'Impreza' would set the alarm bells ringing for insurance company with or without a turbo.

I paid £150 extra on my policy. So £1.8k, where as the Turbo was £lol5k.
 
2k in insurance for something that has a **** interior, no power and **** fuel economy?

Rather you than me :/
 
I see no estate content here, just a hatchback Impreza ;)

Also pretty sure that the unequal manifolds are standard affair on these models anyway so it'll just be the decat and larger exhaust added on.

Shame it lacks a turbo as without one these cars are a bit of an odd one for reasons stated above.

If they were in budget I'd have gone with the 320d, the whole lolswirlflaps thing is either a. easily fixed, or b. hyped beyond belief (although I do know someone who it happened which required significant repair to rectify).
 
Last edited:
Car looks nice but i was under the impression the non turbos were terrible for the above reasons?

I agree entirely with the above reasons. I have no reason to why I shouldn't. It is a bit of a weird purchase coming from a light T-Sport Yaris which is nippy, to a underpowered awd more expensive to fuel/slower car. However I liked the look of it, and thought why not. A lot of the T-Sports are going off the roads. 1 month a go a lad I used to speak to rolled his and passed away, instant death.

I'm thinking the insurance premiums for those will go up as more people have started to recognise and buy them..and crash them.
 
I agree entirely with the above reasons. I have no reason to why I shouldn't. It is a bit of a weird purchase coming from a light T-Sport Yaris which is nippy, to a underpowered awd more expensive to fuel/slower car. However I liked the look of it, and thought why not. A lot of the T-Sports are going off the roads. 1 month a go a lad I used to speak to rolled his and passed away, instant death.

I'm thinking the insurance premiums for those will go up as more people have started to recognise and buy them..and crash them.

So you thought you'd swap it for a car that you think is terrible? That doesn't make any sense
 
Great if you are a farmer who has to drive along an unadopted road, that freezes up in winter, and who needs more luxury than a Land Rover.
Couldn't see past the Skoda badge?! mmmmm
 
So you thought you'd swap it for a car that you think is terrible? That doesn't make any sense

;)

I actually love the car. Yes it's not economical or the fastest of the bunch, those are facts but for the couple of days I have owned it, I've enjoyed it. Might be a different story as I progress with ownership of it, but I'll defiantly make the most of it.
 
I think even the guy who purchased the most expensive secondhand clio in history enjoyed his car for a few weeks.

Looks aright but seems like a bad choice to me.

Why didn't you just buy a petrol A4?
 
Back
Top Bottom