So I'm back to Winamp 2.95

Who cares what it looks like though, when it's usability is fantastic, does exactly what it says on the tin, and uses a tiny footprint too! (While running as a shoutcast server and with wwwinamp, that's using 15mb of RAM)
 
Moredhel said:
Who cares what it looks like though, when it's usability is fantastic, does exactly what it says on the tin, and uses a tiny footprint too! (While running as a shoutcast server and with wwwinamp, that's using 15mb of RAM)
Click to expand...

Me. I don't have a high-spec machine for things to look ugly. Visual appeal is a valid criterion!
 
Well, you can make it look pretty if you wish, I personally find every skin I've ever tried isn't as usable as the default, but if form over function is your thing there's infinite possibilities with Winamp.
 
I like the newer Winamp layout (Bento) too much to go back to the older versions, for my netbook I just use Spotify because I'm too lazy to sync music between my PC and netbook. :p
 
:S Yuk!

WinAMP should be modern, slick....like mine!

Winamp.jpg


I only load media library when I add new music then close it. My playlist is enqueued in a specific order (genre sorting) which is pee easy to do as I have a playlist for each genre.
 
mrk said:
:S Yuk!

WinAMP should be modern, slick....like mine!

http://robbiekhan.co.uk/root/temp/Winamp.jpg[/img

I only load media library when I add new music then close it. My playlist is enqueued in a specific order (genre sorting) which is pee easy to do as I have a playlist for each genre.[/QUOTE]

ewww. :p
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom