So many lenses, so little time...

Associate
Joined
5 Sep 2003
Posts
760
Location
Cardiff Geordie
Hi all. I have had my Canon EOS 550D for about three years now; I'm a relative amateur. Bought it with the kit 18-55mm and then bought a 70-300mm last year which is great for wildlife shots when out exploring etc. I'm a bit sick of having to constantly swap lenses when just out sightseeing etc so thinking of swapping lenses.*

I noticed Tamron do an 18-270mm which might be the best of both worlds for me; a decent 'coverall' anyway, so was thinking about getting one of those (I know I probably wouldn't get much at all for my 18-55 but have a friend who bought her EOS with a fixed 50mm so she might buy this one off me...).

Apart from that, I was thinking about getting a second lens for portraits/indoor shooting (so ideally something pretty wide with a decent aperture - around f/1.4?). I'm just trying to figure out which factor is most important to me - for example, do I get a Sigma 10-20mm that only goes down to like f/4.0, or go for a standard Canon 50mm that goes down to f/1.4? (no way could I afford the f/1.2s!! ;-) )? OR, is there a lens that somehow achieves both requirements? I've seen Sigma do a 30mm f/1.4 which is slightly wider than Canon's 50mm I guess....

Anyone got any suggestions?? Or objections as to why my current plans are ill-informed?! :-)
 
:-) tell me about it! It's not a cheap hobby! Ok, good advice re. the 30mm Sigma. I had heard that a decent compromise to that might be the Canon 28mm which, although it only goes down to f/1.8 rather than f/1.4, I probably wouldn't notice much difference (coming from the 18-55mm which only goes down to f/3.5....), and it's cheaper!! :)
 
Back
Top Bottom