Yesterday the NYPost posted a story involving Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden and emails obtained from an abandoned laptop that was sent in to a shop for repair. Joe Biden has always denied any involvement in his sons shady foreign business dealings but here's some of the highlights:
https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/
Despite the emails Joe Biden still denies any involvement whatsoever and remember, it's innocent until proven guilty.
My main point of this post though is that social media (Facebook/Twitter) have been ferociously censoring any mention of the story and anyone who tried to link to it was either blocked from doing so or suspended, or both.
I don't think anyone can deny that if the shoe were on the other foot and it involved Trump and one of his sons, there would be wall to wall coverage in the corporate media to damage his re-election chances, so given that we've had 4 years of hysterical media coverage about Russian election interference, why is it acceptable for many of those same private corporations to meddle themselves by either not reporting on certain items in any meaningful way or by blocking the dissemination of information by the voting public on social media?
https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/
The never-before-revealed meeting is mentioned in a message of appreciation that Vadym Pozharskyi, an adviser to the board of Burisma, allegedly sent Hunter Biden on April 17, 2015, about a year after Hunter joined the Burisma board at a reported salary of up to $50,000 a month.
“Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together. It’s realty [sic] an honor and pleasure,” the email reads.
An earlier email from May 2014 also shows Pozharskyi, reportedly Burisma’s No. 3 exec, asking Hunter for “advice on how you could use your influence” on the company’s behalf.
Despite the emails Joe Biden still denies any involvement whatsoever and remember, it's innocent until proven guilty.
My main point of this post though is that social media (Facebook/Twitter) have been ferociously censoring any mention of the story and anyone who tried to link to it was either blocked from doing so or suspended, or both.
I don't think anyone can deny that if the shoe were on the other foot and it involved Trump and one of his sons, there would be wall to wall coverage in the corporate media to damage his re-election chances, so given that we've had 4 years of hysterical media coverage about Russian election interference, why is it acceptable for many of those same private corporations to meddle themselves by either not reporting on certain items in any meaningful way or by blocking the dissemination of information by the voting public on social media?
Last edited: