http://www.fpslabs.com/reviews/video/a-brief-look-at-crossfirex-scaling
The numbers presented in this article should only be interpreted as “a brief look at the state of scaling performance generated by AMD’s current beta CrossFireX driver”. Again, the numbers presented in this article are tentative -by no means are they or should they be interpreted as directly indicative of the performance that CrossFireX will deliver upon its official release.
. I'm sure 3dmark was CPU bound even at 4.2Ghz on a quad 45nm due to the default resolution of 1280x1024. I really think in the times that we are in that we should raise the default benchmark of 1280x1024 and run at least at 1680x1050 as that's the average screen size from members who posted in the screen size poll. We should take the CPU bound scenario out of the equation and progress forward as new hardware comes out. Not stick to the small resolution it's always been when we have all this new hardware. I know this is the way it's always been done but surely we need to move on.
. Thank you.