Hi all,
I have been getting a few undeliverable email bounces to addresses I haven't ever heard of!
Here are 2 of the mails I have gotten today, it is my main email account so it is worrying...
Any ideas?
I have been getting a few undeliverable email bounces to addresses I haven't ever heard of!
Here are 2 of the mails I have gotten today, it is my main email account so it is worrying...
Code:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[email protected]
Unrouteable address
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from wsmarth-maltese.pas.sa.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.228])
by fall-sauza.pas.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1Ibxf4-0002k2-9q
for [email protected]; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:12:38 -0700
Received: from domrl-brush.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.231.198])
by wsmarth-maltese.pas.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #4)
id 1Ibxf4-0000ql-00
for [email protected]; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:12:38 -0700
X-ELNK-Loop: [email protected]
Received: from gato ([88.24.133.173])
by domrl-brush.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP id
1iBXEX6CA3Nl5vE0
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:12:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Fernando Munoz (10.19.12.18) by gato (PowerMTA(TM) v3.2r4) id
hfp12o34d02j90 for <[email protected]>; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:12:36 +0100
Message-Id: <20070930031236.10732.qmail@gato>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Sexual enhancement right now!
From: VI@GRA ® Official Site ID 480 <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:12:32 -0400 (EDT)
<style>
<!HAHAHAHAHA. This cross-dressing loony is turning out to be a godsend
for the liberals.
(snip)
After we bomb North Korea, what's the next country we should invade?
"Iran. Though that's the beauty part of Iraq: It may well not be
necessary. Because precisely what I'm saying with nuking North
Korea-despite that wonderful peace deal Madeline Albright negotiated
with the North Koreans, six seconds before they feverishly began
developing nuclear weapons. They're a major threat. I just think it
would be fun to nuke them and have it be a warning to the rest of the
world."
(snip)
><
I'm gonna say I could take Ray Romano. Just 'cause I really want to. Here
are my faves from the above page:
The Onion: Who could you take in a fight?
Conan O'Brien: Let's see, who could I take in a fight? Definitely Ruth
Bader Ginsburg. Have you seen her? Her upper body is very frail. I think I
could take her if she was sleepy and I had a two-by-four. She'd go down
quickly.
The Onion: Who could you take in a fight?
Emo Philips: Hawking, Reeve. Not at the same time.
--
ironcladlou, keeper of faq, bringer of poop humor
"You are a pitiful excuses for a human beings." - tzakol
><!Hi,
I was wondering what is the best way to find out the person to whom a coat
of arms was granted. I have a list from Burke's Armory of Perry/Pery Arms
that were granted (about 15 in total) but most of them don't say which
particular person the Arms were granted to, although I know one or two of
them. I have found one of the families in the Herald's visitations, but it
doesn't say to whom the arms were granted, is the earliest person in the
pedigree the original bearer of the arms? I realise I can apply to the
College of Arms, but I was hoping there would be a slightly more inexpensive
option!
Thanks
Vicki
_________________________________________________________________
Match.com - Click Here To Find Singles In Your Area Today!
>
<!For those AFers contemplating a walking program this Spring, you may want to
pick up the April issue of Prevention. A special issue devoted to Walking
Smart.
Included is a 4 week pull-out plan specified for either the Walking Rookie or
the Walking Whiz. Lots of great tips. Also included is their test of Walking
Shoes including an excerpt on whether your foot is neutral, rigid or flexible
which should enter into your choice of shoes. Shoes tested were Adida, Asics,
New Balance, Nike, Reebox and Saucony. I have decided I must have the New
Balance 788WB as the testers commented on lots of space in the toe area. Also
lists the 12 best Walking Cities.
</style>
<center>
<a href="http://www.aboveeast.com"><img src="http://www.mostseason.net/1.gif">
<style>
Remember Friday, April 2 is Prevention's National Walk to Work Day.
Plus a lot of other good articles.
Jo Ann
>
<!There used to be this show on Channel 7 (WXYZ in Detroit) Friday nights at
11:30 pm called "In Concert". I was an impressionable 13-yr-old just gettin'
in to rock music in the summer of 1974 when they showed parts of the
California Jam in sucessive weeks on TV. I was a Deep Purple freak (still
am) and sat glued to the set, enthralled with Ritchie Blackmore's stage
antics (trashing a television camera while it was filming him and 'blowing
up' his amps).
Well, "Deep Purple - Live In California '74" was released on DVD yesterday,
and it's just as enthralling (warts and all) as it was 26+ yeard ago. It may
not have been their best show, but it reminded me of the thrill I got when I
was a kid. I hope that thrill never goes away.
--
Steve >
<!Hi there, when I first turn on my computer for the day, it will run fine for
up to 3 minutes or so until I get a complete blue screen with an error
message which reads:
____________________________________________
*** HARDWARE MALFUNCTION
PLEASE CONTACT YOUR HARDWARE VENDOR (something like this)
*** The sv
____________________________________________
I can not do a CRTL-ALT-DEL reboot or anything....no response to anything
except for a complete hard reboot. After a reboot my computer will run
perfectly fine and won't see this message again.
I only get the error message when my computer is cold it seems. But after
running a while, it runs perfectly.
Has anyone had this problem, or can anyone shed some light into this issue
please?
Thank you very much for your help people.
Please respond to group. Thank you.
</style>
Code:
is message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[email protected]
Unrouteable address
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from wsmarth-maltese.pas.sa.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.228])
by fallback-peafowl.pas.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1IbxfD-0002XT-49
for [email protected]; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:12:47 -0700
Received: from domrl-brush.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.231.198])
by wsmarth-maltese.pas.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #4)
id 1IbxfC-0000sE-00
for [email protected]; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:12:46 -0700
X-ELNK-Loop: [email protected]
Received: from gato ([88.24.133.173])
by domrl-brush.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP id
1iBXES6wL3Nl5vE0
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:12:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Fernando Munoz (10.19.12.18) by gato (PowerMTA(TM) v3.2r4) id
hfp12o34d02j90 for <[email protected]>; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:12:32 +0100
Message-Id: <20070930031232.10700.qmail@gato>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Sexual enhancement right now!
From: VI@GRA ® Official Site ID 480 <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:12:27 -0400 (EDT)
<style>
<!HAHAHAHAHA. This cross-dressing loony is turning out to be a godsend
for the liberals.
(snip)
After we bomb North Korea, what's the next country we should invade?
"Iran. Though that's the beauty part of Iraq: It may well not be
necessary. Because precisely what I'm saying with nuking North
Korea-despite that wonderful peace deal Madeline Albright negotiated
with the North Koreans, six seconds before they feverishly began
developing nuclear weapons. They're a major threat. I just think it
would be fun to nuke them and have it be a warning to the rest of the
world."
(snip)
><
I'm gonna say I could take Ray Romano. Just 'cause I really want to. Here
are my faves from the above page:
The Onion: Who could you take in a fight?
Conan O'Brien: Let's see, who could I take in a fight? Definitely Ruth
Bader Ginsburg. Have you seen her? Her upper body is very frail. I think I
could take her if she was sleepy and I had a two-by-four. She'd go down
quickly.
The Onion: Who could you take in a fight?
Emo Philips: Hawking, Reeve. Not at the same time.
--
ironcladlou, keeper of faq, bringer of poop humor
"You are a pitiful excuses for a human beings." - tzakol
><!Hi,
I was wondering what is the best way to find out the person to whom a coat
of arms was granted. I have a list from Burke's Armory of Perry/Pery Arms
that were granted (about 15 in total) but most of them don't say which
particular person the Arms were granted to, although I know one or two of
them. I have found one of the families in the Herald's visitations, but it
doesn't say to whom the arms were granted, is the earliest person in the
pedigree the original bearer of the arms? I realise I can apply to the
College of Arms, but I was hoping there would be a slightly more inexpensive
option!
Thanks
Vicki
_________________________________________________________________
Match.com - Click Here To Find Singles In Your Area Today!
>
<!For those AFers contemplating a walking program this Spring, you may want to
pick up the April issue of Prevention. A special issue devoted to Walking
Smart.
Included is a 4 week pull-out plan specified for either the Walking Rookie or
the Walking Whiz. Lots of great tips. Also included is their test of Walking
Shoes including an excerpt on whether your foot is neutral, rigid or flexible
which should enter into your choice of shoes. Shoes tested were Adida, Asics,
New Balance, Nike, Reebox and Saucony. I have decided I must have the New
Balance 788WB as the testers commented on lots of space in the toe area. Also
lists the 12 best Walking Cities.
</style>
<center>
<a href="http://www.aboveeast.com"><img src="http://www.mostseason.net/1.gif">
<style>
Remember Friday, April 2 is Prevention's National Walk to Work Day.
Plus a lot of other good articles.
Jo Ann
>
<!There used to be this show on Channel 7 (WXYZ in Detroit) Friday nights at
11:30 pm called "In Concert". I was an impressionable 13-yr-old just gettin'
in to rock music in the summer of 1974 when they showed parts of the
California Jam in sucessive weeks on TV. I was a Deep Purple freak (still
am) and sat glued to the set, enthralled with Ritchie Blackmore's stage
antics (trashing a television camera while it was filming him and 'blowing
up' his amps).
Well, "Deep Purple - Live In California '74" was released on DVD yesterday,
and it's just as enthralling (warts and all) as it was 26+ yeard ago. It may
not have been their best show, but it reminded me of the thrill I got when I
was a kid. I hope that thrill never goes away.
--
Steve >
<!Hi there, when I first turn on my computer for the day, it will run fine for
up to 3 minutes or so until I get a complete blue screen with an error
message which reads:
____________________________________________
*** HARDWARE MALFUNCTION
PLEASE CONTACT YOUR HARDWARE VENDOR (something like this)
*** The sv
____________________________________________
I can not do a CRTL-ALT-DEL reboot or anything....no response to anything
except for a complete hard reboot. After a reboot my computer will run
perfectly fine and won't see this message again.
I only get the error message when my computer is cold it seems. But after
running a while, it runs perfectly.
Has anyone had this problem, or can anyone shed some light into this issue
please?
Thank you very much for your help people.
Please respond to group. Thank you.
</style>Any ideas?
