spec check for vmware...

Associate
Joined
28 May 2003
Posts
1,852
please critique this spec:

speckb8.jpg


please bear in mind that the machine is primarily for vmware purposes for a dev environment to be used for certification purposes. i've gone for two hard drives and 4gb of ram in the first instance - one hard drive for the host os and another for guest os's. the intentions are to add an additional hard drive and another 4gb of ram in due course.

i've gone for the m-atx motherboard for the on-board graphics. i've also gone for the hdmi version of that motherboard as i will likely cascade this down to htpc duties in a few years time once i have replaced my crt tv. (my old athlon xp 3200 with 2gb ram is in the process of being cascaded down!)

i've been umming and ahhing between amd / intel for quite a while now, and i'm not averse to overclocking so if you can come up with more bang for the buck out of an overclocked intel machine then let me have your suggestions!

many thanks in advance.

edit: i ought to have mentioned that i already have keyboard, mouse, and tft. that said, these will only be used for initial setup as i plan to remote control everything from my laptop once i have the base o/s and drivers installed.

edit2: also, if you are able to come up with a more bang for the buck solution don't feel that you have to be tied to m-atx with onboard graphics - the case will take an atx board, and obviously being a vmware machine just lob in the cheapest graphics you can find so long as it's dedicated memory and not this hyper-memory rubbish that steals system memory!
 
Last edited:
AMD cpu - never had one so cannot comment. I did however upgrade my E4400 to a Q6600 quad not so long ago as I was noticing performance issues with the slower cpu.

hi m_cozzy, thanks for your reply, i'm particularly interested in the bit above. whats the pattern on processor utilisation on a c2q compared to a c2d. i posted in the cpu specific forum and the consensus was (albeit after only a few people had had a chance to reply) that the free version of vmware would not utilise more than one core. as this is pretty much going to be a dedicated vmware box, plus maybe a few other odds and ends that i would maybe want to leave running, i'm not sure i see the point in the massive increase in price to have a few cores sat idle most of the time. i would greatly appreciate your first hand experience on this. cheers.
 
how about this instead?
(i've no idea why the price or line total's are zero'd!)
(also, bear in mind when comparing this to the other spec, that i have upped the secondary hard drive to 500gb, and there is 8gb of ram in this spec).

specaz1.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom