homerio said:
JoeBoi said:Just a question I'd ask how comes your buying some Thermal Compound with a retail CPU?
BigDom said:Watercooling....
BigDom said:4800 isn't worth the extra over the 4400. the watercooling make I believe is a good one.
Not true, not true at all.. HOWEVER Raptors will make not much difference either. These solutions are REALLY over hyped.Energize said:The 80b hdds raided wont beat a raptor, raid 0 hardly makes a difference in gaming.
Energize said:Why isnt it true? Game benchmarks seem to prove so, raid 0 made no difference. the raptors were faster than normal hdds and two raptors in raid 0 didnt even beat a single raptor so 2 normal sata hdds arent going to beat it are they?
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=2101&p=10
Even in the none gaming benchmarks raid 0 offers little improvement over the raptors and if the raided drives werent raptors I think they certainly would have performed worse than the single raptor.
Not to Mention benchmarks are IRRELEVANT... What matters is perception and you won't notice much of a difference with perception ESPECIALLY as the games won't be on RAID anyway... They'll be on the data disks (so there save games, config files etc. are safe ).Monstermunch said:Sorry but you are wrong. The 3gb/s transfer rates specced in SATA2 are unobtainable without raid.
It has been proved that raid0 or raid0+1 is faster, cheaper, quieter and more reliable than raptors.