Spending an extra 50% on a VA panel, freesync and bits

Associate
Joined
2 Feb 2016
Posts
321
Location
East Midlands
Can't tell what's the quality of the new Samsung CFG series, as they're still on pre-order. But specs-wise, they're quite expensive, and for a slightly cheaper price, you can actually get a bigger model from a competitor with otherwise identical specs:
Acer XZ271 for £300

I'm using the bigger brother (Acer XZ321Q, which is £430), and it's GOOOOD.

Then again, Samsung also boasts a 1ms pixel response time, which is apparently a first for VA panels? But from what I've found, this is achieved by "impulsive scanning technology", which synchronizes the backlight with the frames output on the screen. Which to me sounds like backlight strobing, which in practical sense means flickering.

As for the actual question:
Yes, in my opinion it is worth it to pay 50% extra to get a VA or IPS, instead of a TN monitor. But usually you don't have to pay that much premium to get them.

Ps. Performance-wise, all of these are the same (1920x1080 @144Hz), so I think jigger is suggesting that with your Fury and i7, you could probably even go for 2560x1440 @144Hz, or 4k @60Hz.

Thankyou for the reply, I'll look at the Acer.
2560x1440 or 4k would be a bigger monitor though right? I'm using a real old 22inch right now and sit pretty close.

B25FD518-D845-4332-9B57-F8491E652F47.jpg
 
Well, the higher resolutions are usually indeed found in bigger monitors, but there are 24" 4k monitors, as well. Like the LG 24UD58 for £290. 4k on a 24" is for most people an overkill, though. 27" is slightly better for 4k, but you will probably still need to squint a little when reading text. One such option would be the LG 27UD58 for £350.

But because of current bandwidth limitations, 4k is only available with 60Hz refresh rate. And judging from your rig, you probably also want to game on it, which means that 144Hz might be the optimal choice, in which case 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 are the better options. And because you have an AMD card, it means you should also look at FreeSync monitors (in comparison, G-Sync monitors are limited to nVidia cards, and are more expensive, as well).

So next comes the question with budget. If you want 2560x1440 @144Hz, then you're probably looking at a budget starting from £400 and upwards, like the Acer XF270HU. The Acer XZ271 I mentioned earlier is very good bang for buck at £300, but it's also only 1920x1080, which some people think is too low for 27". But that is highly dependent on one's own eye sight and viewing distance. Like said, I have the XZ271's big brother XZ321Q, you can check my review of it here. Should be quite similar in most aspects, except for the diagonal size.

Ps. I'm only listing IPS and VA monitors, as I personally won't recommend TN monitors.
Lots to think about there, thanks for all that.
Pretty sure I don't need 4k 24", I'd prefer a higher frame rate, I'm young with very good eyes but don't see that amount of benefit.
Suppose I need to decide if I really do want a 24" or if 27 would be better. I'm used to a 22 right now so maybe 27 is a leap.
 
Last edited:
I'd be looking at a higher resolutions than 1920x1080 with that system. Dell UltraSharp U2515H maybe. The Dell lacks FreeSync but might over well.
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18759926&page=3

Yeh I think they Dell looks really nice, but its only 60Hz, I want to try a higher frame rate monitor.
So i think i want a nice looking 24-27" 2560x1440 IPS/VA running at least 120Hz. And preferably freesync.

This hits it alll but is only TN... the ACER XG270HUAomidpx
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/acer-xg270huaomidpx-27-2560x1440-tn-freesync-144hz-gaming-widescreen-led-zeroframe-monitor-orange-mo-11g-ac.html
 
Last edited:
I think a lot of people are missing that the Samsung display is a Quantum Dot VA display, which means the potential for seriously incredible black levels, almost OLED-level.

For those who care about that kind of amazing contrast, it would indeed be worth it over other options.

Frankly, I'm quite excited to see quantum dot displays come to PC monitors, and in such an affordable position given that OLED's are a questionable future and undoubtedly will be very expensive for quite a while still.

Interesting, I didn't actually know thats what it meant.
I am swaying toward the 24" Samsung.
I know I can do higher res with my rig but finding the right screen that's bigger is proving to be difficult.
A 27"+, with 120Hz+, more than HD (2560x1440), freesync preferable, preferably not TN. All in a sleek, high quality display and at an affordable price (I can't even find one at an expensive price!).
 
Acer XZ271 for £249 at the moment on sale. 27 in/144hz/freesync/VA panel (using very similar one to the Samsung).


That's what I would go for.

Looks nice but 1080p at 27", id like to try a 1440 at that size. Also OCUK shows it at pre order £299 not £249 for me.
 
See I really like the Dell S2716DG, seems like a nice monitor, the exact spec I want.
BUT
It's G-Sync (i need freesync) AND it's £600 (I suspect G Sync ups the price)
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/dell-s2716dg-27-2560x1440-tn-g-sync-144hz-gaming-widescreen-led-monitor-midnight-grey-mo-084-de.html

Edit:
I don't think the Asus MG278Q looks as nice but is similar spec. I really don't know if I want a TN though (The Dell is TN too)
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asus-mg278q-rog-dominator-27-2560x1440-tn-freesync-144hz-gaming-widescreen-led-slim-bezel-monitor-mo-087-as.html.

Maybe I need to go to a local shop and actually look at some TN panels in the flesh.

Ooooh Asus MG279Q ROG...
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asus-mg279q-rog-dominator-27-2560x1440-ips-freesync-144hz-gaming-widescreen-led-slim-bezel-monitor-mo-083-as.html
Bit pricey but.. 27", 1440, 144Hz, Freesync, IPS panel.
4ms response time. I'll look for some reviews and see if I blow the budget and more on this...

Or the alternative Acer XF270HU
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/acer-predator-xf270hu-27-2560x1440-ips-freesync-144hz-gaming-widescreen-led-monitor-black-red-mo-095-ac.html#description
 
Last edited:
Looks like a great monitor.

But as we're mere weeks away from CES, I'd almost suggest waiting to see if anything new is coming along. The monitor(s) you do want now are definitely not going to get any more expensive, so there's not much to lose if you're just a bit patient.

Anything announced at CES probably wont be available for a while, but if you're looking to splash £400-500+, it may be worth waiting to see if you can get something a bit more special with your money. Display tech is coming along quickly nowadays. Far cry from the past 5-10 years of stagnancy.

Probably be next year at least.
Anywhere I can keep an eye on what's released?
 
Back
Top Bottom