No overclock can be considered completely stable, they could fail orthos eventually be it 24hrs, 48hrs, 200hrs etc. 'Stable enough' is what you are looking for and 8 hours is considered to be a general consensus that it is 'stable enough' to run most if not all aplications without crashing. I have had orthos fail on me after 52 hours (left it running while I was away one weekend lol) but imo that is 'stable enough' for what I used my pc for. Some don't even use orthos to declare their PC stable - if it runs thier applications fine then they consider it to be stable. Do what makes you feel comfortable that your pc is 'stable'.
when i've oc mine a bit too far or not got settings quite right,orthos fails within seconds,so if i run it for 20mins and it dont fail thats fine for me.
does it run my sys without crashing any of my progs/games is what matters.if it runs fine i dont thnk it matters about orthos.i dont think theres many progs,games or otherwise,that push a system like orthos does anyway.
personal choice i guess,or maybe i just cant be arsed to wait 8 hours while orthos is running
as Jokester pointed out to me. and this techneequ worked for me,
overclock by 50-100mhz per time, then prime for 30 mins, and when you finally get the ending result you want and it completes a prime, then use prime for about 12-24 hours depending on how much time you have.
I don't think orthos is such a great stress testing program. What REALLY testes my computer is transcoding a movie in Nero. I've had oc's 12hr dual prime95 stable, and I got an almost instant freeze when I started transcoding... Upping the Vcore one notch helped though
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.