Associate
- Joined
- 19 Aug 2011
- Posts
- 149
I'm not posting images of my reults while running prime, this is after testing, and I'd like to know some views on this
http://imageshack.us/a/img405/741/98432594.jpg
These Temps etc.. are while my rig is bassically Idle, and show Min/Max while so. I can tell you that I ran both Prime 95 and IntelBurn Testv2. both showed passed, IntelBurn Test passed with both Standard and High 10 passes each, however was 20c higher than Prime, though I believe this to be a normal expectance Prime reached a Max of 83c while Intel maxed at 105c if only for a few seconds, but it did CPU-Z vcore showed a voltage of 1.400 for both Intel and Prime95 CPUID dances the voltages about from Value 1.24 to Max 1.39v while Idling, however 1.24 is mostly what it is while Idle. Intel reported as my system had passed the test, was most likely stable, So, Question? given the fact that my system isnt going to be pushing 100% load 100% of the time, in all due repect probably never, how does this result compare? could I now for get about it, and call it a stable overclock?
http://imageshack.us/a/img405/741/98432594.jpg
These Temps etc.. are while my rig is bassically Idle, and show Min/Max while so. I can tell you that I ran both Prime 95 and IntelBurn Testv2. both showed passed, IntelBurn Test passed with both Standard and High 10 passes each, however was 20c higher than Prime, though I believe this to be a normal expectance Prime reached a Max of 83c while Intel maxed at 105c if only for a few seconds, but it did CPU-Z vcore showed a voltage of 1.400 for both Intel and Prime95 CPUID dances the voltages about from Value 1.24 to Max 1.39v while Idling, however 1.24 is mostly what it is while Idle. Intel reported as my system had passed the test, was most likely stable, So, Question? given the fact that my system isnt going to be pushing 100% load 100% of the time, in all due repect probably never, how does this result compare? could I now for get about it, and call it a stable overclock?