Steak People in Here PLZ URGENT!

Associate
Joined
27 Apr 2007
Posts
2,186
Location
Edinburgh
Hey folks,

I recently bought a 1kg Porterhouse steak from Turner and George. Now I was hoping this steak was going to be about 1"thick and evened out, but instead it ended up being small in diameter but about 3" thick.
Now I've had it out of the fridge and I've just realised I don't have a clue how to cook a steak this thick.

Any ideas? I'm going to start cooking in the next hour or so quick help is much appreciated!
 
First-off, if you're really worried about cooking it through properly, you could always slice the steak in half to give you two smaller steaks.

But in terms of cooking, all you really need to be worried about is ensuring the core temperature comes up to your preferred level of doneness.

So, do you have access to a digital instant-read thermometer/probe? And if not, do you have a metal skewer a few millimetres in diameter?
 


My smoked sea salt arrived today :)

y3iNM7W.jpeg
 
Assuming you want to cook the thing properly in one piece (and slicing a porterhouse in two isn't a great idea in the first place, so I'll retract that...) you'll need flaked salt, a heavy-based frying pan, an oil with a high smoking point, a timing device of some sort, a temperature probe of some sort, cubed unsalted butter and some herbs - thyme is my preferred choice here.

Either liberally sprinkle the surface of your steak with flaked salt well in advance of cooking (as in an hour or more) or just before - anything inbetween won't really have much effect. You want the salt to draw moisture out of the meat and then for some of that to be reabsorbed and help to break down some of the muscle tissue and season the steak from within - don't panic, it won't all get drawn back in and ruin your expensive steak.

Heat your frying pan up until it's very hot and either add a little oil directly to the pan or, as is my preference, brush the salt mixture off the steak, pat dry with a paper towel and then oil the steak itself.

Gently place the steak in the middle of your pan and then start the timer - you're looking to flip the thing every 20-30 seconds throughout the initial cooking process. And don't immediately panic when you don't see a nice crust forming on the steak; this will come in time and be crispier and more beautiful for it.

In terms of the end result, the most important thing for you is to make sure your lovely piece of steak reaches a core internal temperature to match your level of doneness. Rare is 54ºC, medium-rare is 57º and medium is 60º - I'll assume you don't want to any further as you wouldn't have gone to all this trouble to select a steak like this in the first place.

However, how you actually measure this is going to be tricky. With a digital temperature probe or even a more basic meat thermometer (just be careful of how long it takes to read temperature...) it's easy enough, but without one... you'll have to trust your instincts. And this is where the metal skewer comes in - you'll stick that right inside the steak, leave it there for a few seconds and then remove it and press it gently to your lips.

As body temperature tends to hover around 37º you should, in theory, be able to reasonably accurately tell how hot that skewer is without too much bother. If you can't feel any heat it's likely to be around 40º, if it feels warm it's going to be around 50º and if it's hot then it's around 60º - not very accurate, but it'll do.

What I'd do with a piece of steak this thick is to get the meat to around 40º or so and then add some cubed butter and some herbs to the pan and baste the steak as it cooks - slightly tilt the pan and spoon the herb-infused fat over the steak, but keep flipping it to your usual schedule as you go and once the steak has got to within 5º of your intended target temperature, take it off the heat and pop it on a warm plate to rest for at least 10 minutes before serving.

Again, this is where your temperature probe comes in as the steak will continue to cook as it rests, but will then reach a plateau and start to drop back down again. Ideally you're looking to serve when it's dropped to no more than 5º of your target temperature, although I appreciate that's going to be a tough ask if you don't have a digital probe to measure the temperature.

Alternatively you could just get your pan screaming hot, pour oil into the thing until it starts to smoke your kitchen out and then cook the steak for a predetermined amount of time on one side before flipping it and then repeating the trick whilst hoping for the best. Not advisable, but it is the way a lot of people would choose to go.
 
get a pan as hot as you can
sear both sides + round the edge
place pan+steak in a hot pre heated over (around 200c)
(a meat thermometer is useful here) leave in the over till it one stage below what u want ie ig u like it rare take it out when it blue, if you like it medium rare take it out when it rare as it will still be cooking while it resting
rest the steak and make a nice sauce in the pan you just cooked it in


or

tonight i'm going to try something different for me, i got my self a dry salt chamber 35 day aged 950g shorthorn cote de boeuf steak which comes in at 6cm thick, i'm going to put it in the over around 130c till the thermometer shows it at 60c
then i've borrow a industrial blow touch from work and i'm going to sear it , then let it rest :)


some photos from last night

getting the steak ready

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DBz7k5jImqd2kyNFFmdDVWQ0k/edit?usp=sharing

once it was in the oven at 160c for about 20mins the thermometer reached 60c it was time to sear it

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DBz7k5jImqQUFMQXhjczVWRmc/edit?usp=sharing
it only took a few seconds to sear it

what it looked like when finished

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DBz7k5jImqZGp2RWJKcS1LWG8/edit?usp=sharing

it looks slightly over done but that just my bad photos, it was medium/rare. it was so lovely and moist on the inside but with that nice slightly burned taste from the crust
 
Last edited:
3" thick I'd sear in a pan hotter than the sun and roast in an oven hotter than the sun for 10 minutes.

I would do this, flip it lots or little it rarely makes a big difference to a big thick steak. Putting it In a hot oven once the crust/bark is formed from 3-10minutes and measuring the interior temperature will ensure an even cooking.
 
3" thick I'd sear in a pan hotter than the sun and roast in an oven hotter than the sun for 10 minutes.

Thanks for the advice folks, I ended up going for the above suggestion.
The steak went in to a very very hot oven for 10 minutes but it could have done with another 5 minutes as it came out blue lol.
Still it tasted insanely awesome, honestly it was like hot buttery popcorn melt in the mouth meat.
Awe man I'm so hungry now.
 
Thanks for the advice folks, I ended up going for the above suggestion.
The steak went in to a very very hot oven for 10 minutes but it could have done with another 5 minutes as it came out blue lol.
That's what happens when you are given arbitrary instructions to follow and expect to cook something properly.

Your next investment should be a digital temperature probe - cooking methods aside, it's the only way of knowing a steak is cooked correctly. £30 for a Thermapen or anywhere from £5 upwards for a half-decent probe from Amazon and your £20 steaks will never be undercooked again.

Still it tasted insanely awesome, honestly it was like hot buttery popcorn melt in the mouth meat.
You cooked a porterhouse steak until it was blue and it melted in your mouth? Are you completely sure about that?

I honestly fail to see how you could cook a porterhouse to that level of doneness and have it 'melt in the mouth' as you say it did. Medium-rare would seem to be the level you need to get to before a porterhouse is meltingly tender, but if you say it was that way I guess we have to take you at your word!

Out of idle curiosity, what degree of doneness were you aiming for in the first place?
 
it's the only way of knowing a steak is cooked correctly

No it's not, a skewer or a sharp thin knife is perfect, this over complication and black art that people preach on about is complete codswallop, I worked 1/2 a dozen restaurants whilst at college as a KP including a leading French restaurant and not one had a thermometer except for the fridge.

How have excellent chefs cooked for 100's of years without thermometers? they must all be wrong.

How do you gauge a tough steak and think, do you know what it needs, some more heat to soften it up? a Thermometer won't tell you that.

Rubbish
 
How have excellent chefs cooked for 100's of years without thermometers? they must all be wrong.

There is a huge difference that you're missing here - an "excellent chef" will have far more experience cooking and using whatever method they are used to than someone that doesn't know how to cook steak and hence asks on a forum.

If the OP messes up (or gets lucky with some) multiple steaks whilst they learn the non-scientific method then I'm sure they will eventually get it right. If they use a thermometer they can get it right immediately.

It's far from rubbish.
 
It's not really difficult to pick up the principle of hot and cold with a skewer or knife.

It's better to pick up how to buy a good steak in the first place rather than just cooking any steak to a certain temperature, a steak a little more done than you like it isn't terrible and a steak a little underdone isn't going to kill you but a crap bit of beef is still a crap bit of beef regardless of temperature.
 
No it's not, a skewer or a sharp thin knife is perfect, this over complication and black art that people preach on about is complete codswallop, I worked 1/2 a dozen restaurants whilst at college as a KP including a leading French restaurant and not one had a thermometer except for the fridge.
Sorry, but working to exacting temperatures isn't a black art - it's a science. Guessing is the black art here.

And with regard to your restaurant experience, you seem to have conveniently forgotten the hours spent in prep and the exacting standards that kitchens require from their ingredients as well as their staff - spend day in, day out cooking and you develop an intrinsic knowledge of how long it takes to cook something to the level required.

A typical kitchen doesn't have time for a chef to stand watching something cooking, there will be countless other tasks to perform and the time spent in prep ensuring that every single one of your steaks is cut to the same thickness means they don't have to keep watching the thing like a hawk, as your typical home cook would.

How have excellent chefs cooked for 100's of years without thermometers? they must all be wrong.
By carefully perfecting the art over years and years of practice; something that your average home cook, at least when it comes to cooking meat, doesn't have to worry about when they can rely on a Thermapen or similar to keep them out of trouble. Especially when cooking something they may only do once in a blue moon and have a significant amount of money invested in.

And while these 'excellent chefs' might not have employed the use of a thermometer, you can be equally sure that they didn't just cook something at the highest possible temperature for an arbitrary length of time and hope for the best.

How do you gauge a tough steak and think, do you know what it needs, some more heat to soften it up? a Thermometer won't tell you that.
By your logic, continuing to cook a 'tough' steak means you are heating it up further, which doesn't really make much sense as that would suggest you can soften a steak up by overcooking it.

But going along with your claims, neither a thermometer or your finger would tell you that it needs more heat - only experience would do that.

But at least the thermometer would tell you when you're about to overcook your steak and completely balls the whole thing up.

The only thing that is 'rubbish' was your earlier suggestion of how to cook the steak, which was to cookery what licking a finger and holding it up in the wind is to meteorology.
 
Sorry, but working to exacting temperatures isn't a black art - it's a science. Guessing is the black art here.

And with regard to your restaurant experience, you seem to have conveniently forgotten the hours spent in prep and the exacting standards that kitchens require from their ingredients as well as their staff - spend day in, day out cooking and you develop an intrinsic knowledge of how long it takes to cook something to the level required.

A typical kitchen doesn't have time for a chef to stand watching something cooking, there will be countless other tasks to perform and the time spent in prep ensuring that every single one of your steaks is cut to the same thickness means they don't have to keep watching the thing like a hawk, as your typical home cook would.

By carefully perfecting the art over years and years of practice; something that your average home cook, at least when it comes to cooking meat, doesn't have to worry about when they can rely on a Thermapen or similar to keep them out of trouble. Especially when cooking something they may only do once in a blue moon and have a significant amount of money invested in.

And while these 'excellent chefs' might not have employed the use of a thermometer, you can be equally sure that they didn't just cook something at the highest possible temperature for an arbitrary length of time and hope for the best.

By your logic, continuing to cook a 'tough' steak means you are heating it up further, which doesn't really make much sense as that would suggest you can soften a steak up by overcooking it.

But going along with your claims, neither a thermometer or your finger would tell you that it needs more heat - only experience would do that.

But at least the thermometer would tell you when you're about to overcook your steak and completely balls the whole thing up.

The only thing that is 'rubbish' was your earlier suggestion of how to cook the steak, which was to cookery what licking a finger and holding it up in the wind is to meteorology.

See black art. It's just meat and fire.
 
Like anything, you can approach it with a lack of understanding and an assumption that you can get away with things. Often it will work well enough.

A small amount of knowledge and practical application of that knowledge will produce consistently better results. Using a thermometer to measure the temperature of meat is a fairly basic step in the right direction.

Cooking could be described as a black art really - it's difficult to master. It's quite easy to produce okay results though, especially if your standards aren't as high as someone that has mastered "the art".
 
That's what happens when you are given arbitrary instructions to follow and expect to cook something properly.

Your next investment should be a digital temperature probe - cooking methods aside, it's the only way of knowing a steak is cooked correctly. £30 for a Thermapen or anywhere from £5 upwards for a half-decent probe from Amazon and your £20 steaks will never be undercooked again.

You cooked a porterhouse steak until it was blue and it melted in your mouth? Are you completely sure about that?

I honestly fail to see how you could cook a porterhouse to that level of doneness and have it 'melt in the mouth' as you say it did. Medium-rare would seem to be the level you need to get to before a porterhouse is meltingly tender, but if you say it was that way I guess we have to take you at your word!

Out of idle curiosity, what degree of doneness were you aiming for in the first place?

Nope seriously it was great.

There was nothing wrong with the steak, it was still insanely edible mate, like I said it could have done with another 5 minutes that's it, but I'd still eat it as it came out without complaining.
 
That's what happens when you are given arbitrary instructions to follow and expect to cook something properly.

Your next investment should be a digital temperature probe - cooking methods aside, it's the only way of knowing a steak is cooked correctly. £30 for a Thermapen or anywhere from £5 upwards for a half-decent probe from Amazon and your £20 steaks will never be undercooked again.

You cooked a porterhouse steak until it was blue and it melted in your mouth? Are you completely sure about that?

I honestly fail to see how you could cook a porterhouse to that level of doneness and have it 'melt in the mouth' as you say it did. Medium-rare would seem to be the level you need to get to before a porterhouse is meltingly tender, but if you say it was that way I guess we have to take you at your word!

Out of idle curiosity, what degree of doneness were you aiming for in the first place?


Many people seem to think a medium rare is actually bleu/blue, or conversely when people cook to medium rare they normally actual end up something closer to well done. A tale tale sign is they say their bleu/blue steak was juicy and blood poured out- truly blue steak is actually pretty dry and the blood stays firmly within the meat when cut with just spotting.
 
I know what blue is, I have cooked steaks before just not this large hence me asking advice.
Anyway I'll leave you folks to discuss the merits of steak cooking as my questions were answered.
Thanks to all that offered advice :)
 
Back
Top Bottom