Strongest x5 engine?

Associate
Joined
25 Sep 2003
Posts
1,620
Location
Merseyside
Looking at 2001/2 models they all have between 80-120k on the clock.

The amount of miles i put on car doesn't really effect the cost of fuelling too much...

Engines are the:

3.0D
3.0i
4.4i v8

Are they all good engines that will go on and on, providing they have been serviced correctly?
 
Theyre all good engines that will go on and on, providing they have been serviced correctly and not skimped on.
Out of those engines on the X5 I would take the 3.0i or the 3.0D. The 4.4 will cost a lot more money to run in servicing, fuel and repairs.
 
They are all strong, but the one likely to give you the most issues would be the diesel, that millage would put it right bang around the new turbo time.

I can't help but feel that the 3.0 l6 although a great engine could do with a bit more muscle for hauling the X5 around, a light vehicle it is not, it weighs a lot more than a 5 series, more than a 7 series even. So the V8 would suite it the best of the petrol engines, both petrol engines are liekly to give less trouble than the diesel, although I think the diesel unit suites the X5 very well indeed.

The only thing I would say is the V8 really will drink like a fish with the weight of an X5 trying to stop it moving. Diesels do make the most sense in these (it isn't often you hear me say this, very rarely in fact) ...but you'll probably find a better V8 car for your money (you didn't say what your budget was I know) unless you have about £15k to spend ...which I doubt as you wouldn't be buying one that old if you did I suspect.

As for what panthro said, that is wrong, the V8 will not cost you any significant (a tad more) amount more to service than the others and both petrol engines will 'probably' cost you less in repairs than the diesel is likely to. Fuel well yes, that's true, the V8 will drink a lot but I'd be willing to bet it wouldn't be massively more than the l6 in an X5 as it'll be working that much less to do the same job. The only one which will turn in anything other than 'bad' fuel economy is going to be the diesel, but then you don't buy these for economy do you :p

The only areas that the V8 is likely to cost you more in repairs is if the VANOS units need fixing (as it has 2, the l6 only 1) or if it has a slack lower timing-chain tensioner and has caused the timing-chain guide rail to get beaten up, that's a big nasty job.

Just listen very carefully for any rattles or tapping from the engine, at both warm and cold idle. Make sure you have a listen outside the car with the bonnet up when the engine has been properly warmed up, you don't want any tapping noises or noises like marbles in a can from the front of the engine (or anywhere for that matter).
 
Last edited:
I drove an automatic 3.0D and was quite impressed with it, very smooth and refined. Nice place to be inside too, very reminiscent of my old 5 series :D Its trip computer told me it'd been averaging about 25mpg which wasn't too bad (no idea what kind of driving though, seemed like mostly around town work).

Much to my suprise I kind of 'liked' the X5, the only thing I don't like being the fact that it's just so big and ungainly, and not particularly good looking :)
 
.....but your Golf does not weigh nigh on 2200kg, or have the additional transmission losses imposed (I assume :)) by a 4x4 system.

It'd probably be better. The BMw mpg calc is so off its not funny. My 320D averaged 26mpg for the last tank but actually calculating that i got 430 miles from the tank in daily heavy traffic i averaged about 32mpg assuming i used all 62L, which i did not so it'd be about 34mpg really.
 
I'm averaging 26MPG in our 525d auto.
Town driving + heavy foot = not so economical.
Dread do think how low it'd be in an X5 :o
 
The 4.4 is reportedly the better petrol engine. Economy isn't that bad compared to the 3.0.
 
And value, from what I read. Can't say I read much saying they were significantly less reliability
 
And value, from what I read. Can't say I read much saying they were significantly less reliability

They are not - they suffer from largely the same issues, however each time you do get an issue it's more expensive to fix on the V8. Two rocker cover gaskets not one for example, and common faults like the CCV - an awkward job on the Inline Six, an absolute nightmare of a job on the V8 as half the engine has to come apart to get to it, for example.

People cite the fact it has only single VANOS versus double VANOS on the Inline Six as some sort of advantage - when an entire refurb VANOS unit with properly designed seals in it costs only £250 for the inline six you realise this isn't the advantage it sounds like.
 
No, it doesn't. It's not even high mileage. Can't imagine thats a great example and you really dont want to buy from the bottom of the X5 market.
 
Back
Top Bottom