student sex attack

So to sum up thread:

OP in reading comprehension fail.

Some people point this out to OP.

OP gets upset.

Other people side track into discussion about CCTV.

Pointless thread tbh...


Or the more accurate version:

OP requests assistance from forum

A few people give their opinions

Two people try to "have a dig" at the OP by pointing out his failure to read the article even though he's already said this himself

OP gets annoyed by trolls trying licking their lips at the sight of someone who failed on the internets
 
Apparently not.



Please provide examples of my offensive behaviour.

Finally, this IS the remedial subforum. Perhaps you glazed over the "spec me a toaster" threads that are so very popular in GD. There is a Speakers Corner for more profound topics.

Would you like to keep digging?

Haha, either you are a troll or you are as thick as the OP suggests.

Dowie has the right of it, as do biohazard and a few others.

You even admit that you didn't read the article so why are you getting all defensive and upset because people pointed that out. You're a little strange.

I said you got offensive, not that you offended me, comprehension failure yet again....tired are you.

And no this is called General Discussion and is not a remedial subforum although threads such as this may make it seem like sometimes.
 
Dowie has the right of it, as do biohazard and a few others.

Why am I not surprised you agree with dowie? I didn't say anything to Biohazard because he has manners.

You even admit that you didn't read the article

Where did I admit that please?

I said you got offensive, not that you offended me, comprehension failure yet again....tired are you.

I didn't say I offended you. I asked for examples of my offensive behaviour. Do you have the reading age of 7 as well?

And no this is called General Discussion and is not a remedial subforum although threads such as this may make it seem like sometimes.

Go ask the mods for a remedial subforum. Brilliant idea.

Would you like to keep digging?
 
Now my question is - why havent they used tech to enhance, zoom in and take snapshots of his face?


There is no such software, you can't magically make more pixels.


You might be able to have someone in ps, clean it up a little but no "enhance and zoom".
 
I said he got offensive as in upset,

Surely then you mean "offended"?

When has "you got offensive" mean "you're upset".



How am I a hypocrite?

You accuse him of "comprehension fail" in a rude way and then read "Please provide examples of my offensive behaviour.", which btw would be fine in any way you used the word even if you meant upset you'd be able to do that, as "show me where i offended you".


You're a hypocrite as you're sitting there on a high horse then doing the exact same things you're mocking him for.
 
http://yourcardiff.walesonline.co.uk/2010/10/21/police-appeal-over-cathays-student-sex-attack/

Did an actual attack take place after he walked for a few minutes with his arm around her or was the act of putting his arm around her all that took place? The article isn't clear and makes references to "inappropriate behaviour", although it is past my bed time and I'm feeling a little sluggish. :o

They seem to be taking it very seriously so I assume something more actually took place but you never know these days!

The OP did say he/she was sluggish when reading, and also said he/she assumed something more happened. So I dont think OP failed at anything other than going to bed on time :D

More importantly, I do hope this guy is found before he attacks again.
 
Why am I not surprised you agree with dowie? I didn't say anything to Biohazard because he has manners.

I see, as I wasn't rude in my original reply I think you are being a little disingenuous then. My original reply answered your question with an explanation of why there was no specific reference to the details of the sexual assault and I pointed out that that the article did indeed state that the CCTV was prior to the actual sexual attack, you asked for clarification, I gave you that clarification which you took offensive to.

If you found it rude in any way then I apologise as it was not my intent at the time.


Where did I admit that please?


Two people try to "have a dig" at the OP by pointing out his failure to read the article even though he's already said this himself


I didn't say I offended you. I asked for examples of my offensive behaviour. Do you have the reading age of 7 as well?

Offensive as in 'going on the offence', for example your original reply to me was quoting selectively and then accusing me of trying to make you look bad, when that was not my intention at all and I thought that was clear in my post which should have been considered as a whole and not as a group of unrelated statements, So when I said "that you didn't consider this and assumed the attack was being described by the man putting his arms around the woman's shoulders", you should have taken the previous statement on why they did not give the details and the points in the article where I pointed out that they state it was prior to the attack as part of that consideration of the entire article, not just the isolated statement.:)

But as for evidence of offensive behaviour in the context you think I meant, the emboldened part of the quoted post is evidence enough.:p



Go ask the mods for a remedial subforum. Brilliant idea.

Would you like to keep digging?

I don't know what I'm digging for, neither do I require a remedial sub-forum. I suggested it for you in frustration over your constant misinterpretation of what I was saying.


Surely then you mean "offended"?

When has "you got offensive" mean "you're upset".

No I mean he got upset and went on the offensive....

poorly worded maybe, but I was typing on a phone at the time.






You accuse him of "comprehension fail" in a rude way and then read "Please provide examples of my offensive behaviour.", which btw would be fine in any way you used the word even if you meant upset you'd be able to do that, as "show me where i offended you".


You're a hypocrite as you're sitting there on a high horse then doing the exact same things you're mocking him for.

I wasn't rude in my original reply, quite the opposite in fact, (or so I thought)

Gambitt went on the offensive and I got all defensive about it. I probably would have been a little more eloquent if I had been at the PC rather than battling the Streak's crappy keyboard.

Besides I am never hypocritical, just complicated.:p
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom