Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 19,488
- Location
- LU7
I work in a school and one of my jobs is taking photos of staff for our staff board. I use my Canon 400D + 50mm f1.8 lens to take nice sharp portrait photos. A colleague of mine has a little boy at home, he's not even 1 yet. She asked me about my camera today as I'd taken a picture of her son last December at our Christmas Bazaar. She said that she was impressed with the quality of the photo. I tried to say it was more down to me than the camera but that didn't work!
I told her that my 400D isn't sold any more but I said I would recommend a camera to her so she and her husband can take photos of their son. They currently use their iPhones and I think they want better quality photos.
I didn't mention it at the time but I think an SLR that can also record video might interest them. I was going to suggest the Canon 700D before I realised that the likes of the 1200D and 100D can both record HD video. So should I recommend either the 1200D or 100D to the 700D considering the prices appear to be £350, £400 and £480 respectively for the body only? I get the impression that my colleague would like a nice lens for taking sharp photos so I thought why waste a few more quid on the standard body with the 18-55mm lens when they might as well save those pennies and spend £70-85 on the Canon 50mm f1.8.
I don't know their exact budget so the 700D might be affordable for them but should I recommend them a Canon DSLR or does the Canon EOS M do what they need? I am concerned that the EOS M won't have the range of lenses if they want to expand their capabilities in the future.
I told her that my 400D isn't sold any more but I said I would recommend a camera to her so she and her husband can take photos of their son. They currently use their iPhones and I think they want better quality photos.
I didn't mention it at the time but I think an SLR that can also record video might interest them. I was going to suggest the Canon 700D before I realised that the likes of the 1200D and 100D can both record HD video. So should I recommend either the 1200D or 100D to the 700D considering the prices appear to be £350, £400 and £480 respectively for the body only? I get the impression that my colleague would like a nice lens for taking sharp photos so I thought why waste a few more quid on the standard body with the 18-55mm lens when they might as well save those pennies and spend £70-85 on the Canon 50mm f1.8.
I don't know their exact budget so the 700D might be affordable for them but should I recommend them a Canon DSLR or does the Canon EOS M do what they need? I am concerned that the EOS M won't have the range of lenses if they want to expand their capabilities in the future.