This 100%. Superheroes, or in this case anti-heroes, just aren't a good fit for this style of game. It's trying to be Fortnite, but with a Suicide Squad skin. Many people are fed up with GaaS looter shooters ; it's a game that no-one really wanted. But a narrative driven action game featuring any of the Justice League or Suicide Squad would have been a money earner.The fact that there isn't a thread about it tells you everything really about what people want from Rocksteady.
Another Batman game probably would have gone down a storm, though I understand they didn't want to keep repeating themselves.
Even an actual Justice league game might have done better, but a suicide squad game? And then people heard it was a live service game.
Couldn't see a thread on this game so made one.
About 1.5 hours into the game and think it is excellent so far.
Great graphics, good bit of humour and brilliant gameplay
Provided they complete the offline Story Mode I'll be fine with that.I believe this game will be shutdown within 3 to 6 months
Played 8Hours so far of the story and I personally think it's a very good game
What's the standard play? Price drop, promises of roadmaps, free to play weekends, price drop, then just fully free to play. Shut the servers down soon after when that fails.
What Warner Brothers executives have apparently learned from the failure of this is that they need to make more Live service games with existing IP's like Harry Potter, but also focus more on mobile games and move away from AAA titles.
Warner Bros. focusing on mobile and free-to-play instead of "volatile" AAA console games
Warner Bros. Discovery gaming boss J.B. Perrette wants the company to move away from the "volatile" market of AAA games…www.eurogamer.net
Basically, all the wrong things.
They all want to make the next Grand Theft Auto online or Fortnite, not realising that not all games can be that.