Associate
Damn, that's a hell of a list of players!
Summer Transfer Window 22/23
- Thread starter robfosters
- Start date
You really don’t want Lacazette believe me. It’s like watching an old man trudge around the pitch. He’s way past his best.
No he wouldn’t, slow and old now and not what we need, there are far better players available on a free, stop trying to palm of your cast offs
I would take Divock Origi though
You wouldnt have Milner yet you would have Moutinho, whos 35 and slow and Tarkowski whos slower then ya nan?
I mean really?
Kessie is Barca bound.
Was the Bebe shout a joke
Caporegime
You wouldnt have Milner yet you would have Moutinho, whos 35 and slow and Tarkowski whos slower then ya nan?
I mean really?
Kessie is Barca bound.
Was the Bebe shout a joke
Bebe could easily replace Sancho and no one would notice output wise.
Caporegime
Fair bit of noise this morning about Haaland £500K a week been agreed with Man City.
Officially 500k who knows unofficially as we know they love to cook the books. Insane money and thats before an outrageous signing on fee. Nothing to a club with the best commercial revenue in the world mind you.
Edit
Talk of 70mil to the agent and his dad. They are just laughing at everyone at this point.
Caporegime
That sort of money to his agent and dad is hilarious and ridiculous at the same time
Edit: ah, it's Raiola. City need to bend over.
That sort of money to his agent and dad is hilarious and ridiculous at the same time
Edit: ah, it's Raiola. City need to bend over.
Why can't Pep do it without hundreds of millions every single year? Is Haaland even suited for them? I dont think he is but moneys irrelevant to them so it doesnt even matter, theyll throw a similar sum to someone else in the next window.
"If people want to believe it’s just money, it’s ok, that’s up to you."
Yea ok Pep.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2014
- Posts
- 5,109
Obnoxious money really.
What I don’t understand is where the need to pay 70m or whatever I’m signing on fee etc comes from. If City didn’t pay it, who will? He certainly doesn’t strike me as a player who wants to go to psg. So if city say 500k per week and 5 million signing on fee who is bettering that?
Its also no use moaning about city or anyone else’s spending when you continue to show the demand for the sport or your team. So if an Arab state takes over Liverpool will you stop talking and supporting your team?
I’ve given up on thinking football will ever turn into an actual competition with salary caps and transfer caps.
Its also no use moaning about city or anyone else’s spending when you continue to show the demand for the sport or your team. So if an Arab state takes over Liverpool will you stop talking and supporting your team?
I’ve given up on thinking football will ever turn into an actual competition with salary caps and transfer caps.
If owners similar to Cities or Newcastle took over my team id want them to fold. Its every use moaning when they are clearly fiddling the numbers. They dont even hide it anymore.
I used to argue against what you said until very recently. I’ve spent a lot of time this year educating myself on the region, money and I can’t follow the sport at all anymore in any real capacity. I no longer follow a team at all after 40 plus years or pay for anything that helps fund the premier league. Sometimes I get weak and browse a forum or a news article but I liken that to the curiosity of looking at an ignored forum members posts.
I don’t want any foreign owners, full stop but I know that’s unreasonable.
What if them folding meant administration and possible liquidation of the club?
sports washing works plain and simple. The likes of sky/the beeb/ITv/BT Sport don't care about where the money comes, nor do the fans generally. You only have to look at Chelsea, one or 2 people were raising concerns a decade ago, and sky laughed it off.
So be it. To be honest id simply stop supporting my club. If people want to get behind that kind of regime then that's up to them but it isnt for me. City is absolutely soulless.
Sorry but I call BS on that. If it was a choice between controversial owners and Liverpool completely disappearing, you’d go for the dodgy owners.
Call BS on what? Im pretty sure i know my own opinion more then you lmao. I've said on several occasions thats its a hard no from me.
Absolutely no chance and i wouldnt be alone in that thinking either. Liverpool fans would protest it.