Soldato
Thing is it's often the players fault for signing new deals over such a period. In 18/19 it was obvious to everyone he needed to move to actually win something, yet he signed a 6yr deal.
I think it is either 100 million or he sees out his contract. We have got to the point where players are just becoming too expensive because of the value they offer to the team.
Reports suggest our bid for Rice was £80m + £10m add ons, payable over 6 years.
We‘re a joke in the transfer market
Personally I’d rather keep him and let him run down his contract than accept that.
I suspect the board will eventually disagree with you it’s too much money for the club to turn down, they will argue it up a little so they look like they were tough and then he will be off. I can’t see them letting him run his contract down any further.Personally I’d rather keep him and let him run down his contract than accept that.
Sell him to United for 150Personally I’d rather keep him and let him run down his contract than accept that.
Sell him to United for 150
Unless you're a club with no regard for financial fair play and run by billionaires with over 115 financial doping charges against them, you have to negotiate in this market.
All I'm seeing is people blindly falling for the 'Club X said this' or 'Club Y done that'.
The reality being that the media or these so called ITK's don't actually know. They're fed third hand information or guessing.
No surprise that on the eve of us making a bid for Rice, we're linked to Havertz. The very next day we've had a bid rejected for Rice, Manchester City might be interested. Its all a game one club making another feel pressure in different ways, no doubt a West Ham insider leaking Manchester City news to try force our hand and so on.
I'll say this if West Ham have caught wind that Manchester City are interested then you'd think they'll reject any proposal we table because it's likely Manchester City will pay more and have less clauses. This doesn't then make it Edu's fault he's being trumped by a financial juggernaut.
Let them do their dance. Can be frustrating on the outside looking in but we really don't know what happens at that level. Sometimes you can't always just 'pay what they want'
People don't seem to understand transfer fees. They make weird comparisons on pure price rather than looking at all the factors that make up a transfer.
Does the club want to sell
How much is the player worth to them
Does the player want to move to a particular club
Are there any agreements in place with the player
Is there a release clause
How long is on the contract
How much and how easy would it be to replace the player
What point in the transfer window is it
How desperate is the buying club
How wealthy is the buying club
Is the buying club in a different league
Is the buying club a direct rival
Someone the other day was arguing that a player wasn't worth £60m because you could have bought Haaland for that. The suggestion that Haaland was worth £60m (or that he actually cost £60m) is just laughable. Thats like saying that Mbappe should be a benchmark for transfer fees if he moves for nothing next summer.
This is a big part of why players are so expensive now. When a player might keep you in the league or get you european football he is worth a huge amount to you. You will have to replace them in all likelihood so you could end up with a rubbish replacement and having made little money. Its much safer to keep your asset.
It's all out of Levy's hands now. Kane has the club by the short and curlys now. Just like Mbappe.He's not, but Levy isn't very smart when it comes to decisions like this.
Kane to PSG, Mbappé to Spurs swap deal?It's all out of Levy's hands now. Kane has the club by the short and curlys now. Just like Mbappe.
Will be interesting to see how it develops
Not worth 100millionPeople don't seem to understand transfer fees. They make weird comparisons on pure price rather than looking at all the factors that make up a transfer.
Does the club want to sell
How much is the player worth to them
Does the player want to move to a particular club
Are there any agreements in place with the player
Is there a release clause
How long is on the contract
How much and how easy would it be to replace the player
What point in the transfer window is it
How desperate is the buying club
How wealthy is the buying club
Is the buying club in a different league
Is the buying club a direct rival
Someone the other day was arguing that a player wasn't worth £60m because you could have bought Haaland for that. The suggestion that Haaland was worth £60m (or that he actually cost £60m) is just laughable. Thats like saying that Mbappe should be a benchmark for transfer fees if he moves for nothing next summer.
This is a big part of why players are so expensive now. When a player might keep you in the league or get you european football he is worth a huge amount to you. You will have to replace them in all likelihood so you could end up with a rubbish replacement and having made little money. Its much safer to keep your asset.
It's all out of Levy's hands now. Kane has the club by the short and curlys now. Just like Mbappe.
Will be interesting to see how it develops
Gundogan officially released by City