***Sunspider Benchmarks - Browser Speed Test***

kona786

kona786

kona786

Soldato
Joined
25 Jun 2007
Posts
22,720
Location
Downtown
Phone Specification:

Samsung Galaxy S3 LTE
Pandoriam 5.7 ROM - Perseus alpha30 KERNEL
Stock clock speeds (Exynos 4412 - 1.4Ghz Quad A9, Android 4.1.2.)


Sunspider Test link - http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html



Browser Results:

Chrome - 1332ms

Chrome Beta - 955ms

Stock Samsung - 1213ms

Quick ICS - 1198ms

Dolphin - 1247ms

Firefox Beta - 1382ms





Chrome

Screenshot_2013-01-12-22-52-50_zps8982f922.png


Chrome Beta

Screenshot_2013-01-12-22-51-10_zps741ab7b6.png


Stock Samsung

Screenshot_2013-01-12-22-57-48_zpscdd0c415.png


Quick ICS

Screenshot_2013-01-12-23-02-10_zpse1a298df.png


Dolphin

Screenshot_2013-01-12-23-04-36_zps7bfd0952.png


Firefox Beta

Screenshot_2013-01-12-23-09-18_zps99ba9d18.png


In general use, Stock Samsung + Quick ICS + Dolphin all feel very smooth and fast in use.

Chrome beta is on steroids - but could do with a little refining when scrolling around - drops framerate - same with normal Chrome.

Firefox Beta - don't really use it as it feels slow and jittery.



More Benchmarks

Google Octane - http://octane-benchmark.googlecode.com/svn/latest/index.html

Mozilla Kraken - http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/



Chrome beta

Octane - 2054

Kraken - 15520ms

Screenshot_2013-01-12-23-56-37_zpsc7942d2b.png


Screenshot_2013-01-13-00-05-40_zps65e6784a.png


Quick ICS

Octane - 1884

Screenshot_2013-01-12-23-58-36_zps6f7f0e1c.png

Vellamo Mobile Benchmark - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo&hl=en

Vellamo:

HTML 5 (default web engine)
SGS3 LTE = 1696

Metal:
S3 LTE = 548


Screenshot_2013-01-13-14-46-41_zps14218570.png





:)
 
Last edited:
Galaxy Note II @ 1.8Ghz
Mr Luong ROM v5.1 - Perseus v31.2 Kernel
Android 4.1.2

Stock Samsung - 963ms

33uxsn4.jpg

Vellamo:

HTML 5 - 1975
Metal - 665

k27ep.jpg
 
Last edited:
HTC one S stock 4.1.1

Stock sense browser - 1060ms

1PQ22.png
Haven't tried any other browsers as the sense browser is the most complete browser overall for me:

- text reflow (pinch to zoom and double tap to zoom) works the best (on ICS other browsers worked great but the JB update messed that up)
- quick thumb controls, which have been tweaked to work even better than the likes of quick ics etc. imo
- fast and smooth, dolphin with the jetpack addon is a bit quicker
- UI on the whole is very nice

And most importantly it actually renders the text/pages properly unlike chrome, opera and firefox! :p
 
I tested my daily driver (Opera Mobile) along with the current favorite (Chrome Beta) add well as some more obscure browsers... here are my results:

Opera Mobile: 1112ms
Chrome Beta: 876ms
Maxthon: 1055ms
xScope: 1018ms
Angel: 1055
Boat: 982ms
Ninesky: 986ms
Skyfire: 1009ms
One Browser (Formerly iBrowser): 984ms
 
Last edited:
Chrome beta seems to use the old javascript engine but uses high cpu utilization/more threads to achieve the better results.
Its still the worse browser on Android, they should just break/remove a few minor bits for higher scores like IE and safari :p

(Sunspider is a bad benchmark for comparing/looking at general performance)
 
^^^ Just a bit of fun and nice to compare everyone results.

I've added a couple of other benchmarks using Google Octane & Mozilla Kraken.



Chrome beta

Octane - 2054

Kraken - 15520ms

Screenshot_2013-01-12-23-56-37_zpsc7942d2b.png


Screenshot_2013-01-13-00-05-40_zps65e6784a.png


Quick ICS

Octane - 1884

Screenshot_2013-01-12-23-58-36_zps6f7f0e1c.png
 
Vellamo's quite good now, lets see what you all get! :)

There seems to be a better correlation between these scores and end user experience over pure javascript tests (i.e Opera won't finish Octane but is much smoother and renders pages correctly over Chrome etc)

HTML 5 (default web engine)
HTC One S (S4) = 1790.
Nexus 7 = 1324.

Metal:
HOS = 650.
N7 = 388.

Advanced video:
HOS = 61 (end boat vid stuttered and stopped playing)
N7 = 50 (the four fish vids didn't run but the boat was perfect)
 
Vellamo looks intensive - Good shout sarge. (Qualcomm biased? ;))

Vellamo:

HTML 5 (default web engine)
SGS3 LTE = 1696

Metal:
S3 LTE = 548

I'll do the rest of the test later on :)

Screenshot_2013-01-13-14-46-41_zps14218570.png
 
Last edited:
kona786 said:
Qualcomm biased? ;)
Click to expand...

Possibly :p ...but it does match what I experience. The SGS3 (Exynos) and HOS deliver the same experience, both are noticeably smoother in app than the Nexus 7, which is still a good performer.

I like the 3G/4G network emulation and cache/cleared cache on the page loading tests too, so much more realistic than everything else.
 
Nokia Lumia 920

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 930.4ms +/- 1.0%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 103.0ms +/- 2.6%
cube: 27.7ms +/- 8.9%
morph: 9.0ms +/- 5.3%
raytrace: 66.3ms +/- 1.8%

access: 68.9ms +/- 2.2%
binary-trees: 16.5ms +/- 6.2%
fannkuch: 26.7ms +/- 2.8%
nbody: 18.5ms +/- 8.4%
nsieve: 7.2ms +/- 4.2%

bitops: 46.3ms +/- 1.9%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 1.1ms +/- 20.5%
bits-in-byte: 11.8ms +/- 4.8%
bitwise-and: 11.3ms +/- 3.1%
nsieve-bits: 22.1ms +/- 4.4%

controlflow: 8.0ms +/- 0.0%
recursive: 8.0ms +/- 0.0%

crypto: 62.2ms +/- 3.6%
aes: 26.5ms +/- 4.3%
md5: 23.2ms +/- 4.5%
sha1: 12.5ms +/- 9.8%

date: 134.1ms +/- 2.7%
format-tofte: 51.8ms +/- 2.3%
format-xparb: 82.3ms +/- 4.9%

math: 104.6ms +/- 2.0%
cordic: 3.2ms +/- 9.4%
partial-sums: 88.2ms +/- 2.8%
spectral-norm: 13.2ms +/- 2.3%

regexp: 29.2ms +/- 4.7%
dna: 29.2ms +/- 4.7%

string: 374.1ms +/- 1.7%
base64: 22.7ms +/- 7.9%
fasta: 37.4ms +/- 5.0%
tagcloud: 122.0ms +/- 1.8%
unpack-code: 75.0ms +/- 4.3%
validate-input: 117.0ms +/- 1.8%
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom