mrk1@1 said:
I saw this last week and enjoyed it. I did feel the plot was a bit weak and the film threw up a few oddities. Namely the ending. It wasn't a great film but enjoyable. I thought the acting was pretty good. My main gripe is the way they play the face off scenarios. Lex Luthur with Kryptonite is not greater than Superman yet it always comes down to the wire. The big problem ,is knowing that Superman will pull though, thus without some really good action fight scenes (which there arn't) it is ultimately a boring one sided showdown.
This weakness has always been overplayed in the superman franchise tv series and films. The extreme of Superman uber ass kicking of average criminals to an ass whoping by Lex with a bit of kryptonite.
What it needed is a bad guy or two on par with Superman in the film because they had some real powers not just an overplayed IQ and deviosity. As with the Spiderman and Bataman films.
I guess I would sum it up along these lines: I enjoy the batman/xmen/spiderman etc cartoons of recent (the joys of NTL family pack)and the film is no better than a live action version of a Marvel/DC bassed cartoon plot/episode. Enjoyable for what it is, if your a fan of the franchise then perfectly watchable but not an all out standalone film like spiderman, X1 and batman begins. I watched Hulk last night (can't believe its 4 years old now) and have the same opinion of that. Its more of a live action cartoon story than a decent film.
I think, considering how long the film was they could/should have started from the beginning and do what they did with batman.
It always seems a bit hit and miss with the Marvel/DC films as some are just dire (electra) some are no better than a cartoon and others are really good.
The problem is that you really need to start things with Lex Luthor and then you can introduce other enemies for Superman in later films that will be more of a challenge.
The problem with Superman is that his vulnerabilities are so few that you can only write so many comics or make so many films where they are played on before things get boring.
Kryptonite of course being one and the other "lack of yellow sun radiation" and there you have it.
What the comics tried to do was give Superman a more vulnerable feel and a lot of his stories in recent times he hasn't neccessarily looked like the automatic winner.
If this film proves popular (which so far it certainly appears to be) then I think we'll see Superman face other "Super Villians" in later films.
Lex Luthor/other humans with Kryptonite will get boring.
Batman is different because although trained to the peak of human perfection, under it all he is still human with all of the vulnerabilities of one.
I've not seen the new Superman movie yet - I'm off on Wednesday and I'm sure I'm going to love it.
It is how they follow it up that will be interesting.
Batman Begins was an excellent re-telling of the origins - so close to Year I but not quite.
The teaser at the end where we see his next case is The Joker (as per Year I) was excellent.
Batman Begins only real issue (as far as I'm concerned) is that there shouldn't have been any costumed villians in it as there weren't in the comic origins.
As has been discussed - the costumed defender is what attracts the costumed villian and it's almost as if Scarecrow was waiting for him rather than him attracting Scarecrow (this was my only slight complaint).