Hi folks, Would you say this lens is a good purchase for me? I currently have a Canon 350D which my dad gave me some months back. Do you think it would be an improvement over the 18-55 kit lens?, this is non IS by the way.
I can't talk for the VC version but YES YES and YES, great lens and great upgrade, the only better lens I would consider for this range would be the 17-55IS but thats double the price.
It's a pretty good lens from the write-ups I've seen although the Non-VC version is sharper. The Non-VC will be my next lens hopefully as I haven't got anything I'd class as decent to cover the <50mm area (Sigma 18-250mm).
Then thinking about some Canon 70-200mm L F4 goodness next year.
It depends on the type of photography you're doing TBH. My photography is 95% outdoors in daylight taking Rallying pics for my Team so I don't think I'll need the VC for this particular "Service Area" short range lens, however, I have got it on my 70-300mm Tamron though where it's fantastic (much better than the sigma OS).
If I was doing darker indoors stuff then I'd really consider it. I used the 70-300mm indoors at the NIA for the Nitro Circus and the VC did a fantastic job.
Hi folks, Would you say this lens is a good purchase for me? I currently have a Canon 350D which my dad gave me some months back. Do you think it would be an improvement over the 18-55 kit lens?, this is non IS by the way.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.