how can you not understand that violence as a last resort isn't a good idea. even less so when it involves a child. smack on the bum, slap on the back of the hand, clip round the ear all well and good and something most of us over the age of 30 will have experienced. that doesn't make it right.
Tate Brothers - Round 2
- Thread starter Ice Tea
- Start date
you're the only one making that claim.
I wonder if the decline in choker chains has some kind of contributory correlation to the apparent rise in dog attacks....
I wonder if the decline in physical discipline has some kind of contributory correlation to the apparent rise in violent crime in kids (kids murdering adults, stabbings, lootings)
Or will this be immediately dismissed as silly rather than having a proper look to see if any of the above may have some kind of relevance?
only anecdotal of course but most of the scrote kids that live round my way are from crappy families (where'll they'll almost certainly be getting a whack round the earhole right and regularly) I'd hazard a guess, and that's genuinely all it is, that a lot of these delinquent kids belong to parents who took too many clips round the earhole as kids themselves.
Fun fact! What are the two things people respond to in the world.
1. Violence
2. Money
Does it make it right?!?! Doesn't matter, people use it to get the results they want. Thats life.
Last edited:
you really think those are the only 2 things people respond to? you are also aware that we've been discussing young children here and not adults? you're seemingly saying that you it doesn't matter whether it's right or wrong, violence against children is just life??
We was originally discussing The Tate brothers to be honest.
and that had moved on to discussing giving a child a slap. 1 too many clips round the ear when you were a kid yourself by the sounds of it.
no more an idiot than the person trying to claim violence and money are the only motivators in society, especially in relation to young children. you need to give your head a shake dude.
... Yeah.. Ok...
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 1,518
Mods maybe we need a Child Discipline thread???
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 1,518
Technically I think the term is herbophiles (young teenagers versus little kids). Not that they aren't massive C Words though
Whatever was used on these pair as kids obviously did not work.
Considering the quality of some posts it is tempting. But the mods already have enough to do administering the existing model of rules and sanctions.
Associate
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2020
- Posts
- 120
- Location
- Close enough to OcUK that my wallet hurts
In an effort to get this thread back on the tracks.
I can see a large amount of sanctimonious, self-opinionated, virtual signalling, twaddled being peddled here. I'm wondering whether this comes before or after the 'Removing children' chapter of the Social workers manual?
IMO the reason we have so many attention seeking, selfish, entitled wannbees, who demand 'respect' (AKA Cash from infamy) like the subjects of this thread, is because their bad behaviour is rewarded as being 'daring' by their followers?
Malcolm McLaren and the Sex Pistols have a lot to answer for.
I can see a large amount of sanctimonious, self-opinionated, virtual signalling, twaddled being peddled here. I'm wondering whether this comes before or after the 'Removing children' chapter of the Social workers manual?
IMO the reason we have so many attention seeking, selfish, entitled wannbees, who demand 'respect' (AKA Cash from infamy) like the subjects of this thread, is because their bad behaviour is rewarded as being 'daring' by their followers?
Malcolm McLaren and the Sex Pistols have a lot to answer for.