• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Team Blue's 10900K Overclocks

I'm hearing 'The default Time Spy CPU test does not scale beyond processors with 10 or more threads.'

what's a stock/clocked 3700X and 3900X do roughly?
 
My 3900X gets 13805 cpu score.

Others with an all core overclock of 4400 get 14395.

Well done improving the single core score.
 
FireTwo said:
I'm hearing 'The default Time Spy CPU test does not scale beyond processors with 10 or more threads.'

what's a stock/clocked 3700X and 3900X do roughly?
Click to expand...

Corect you must use Timspy extreme if you want proper cpu scaling.

mad you can see if you use the free timespy test it thinks the 10900k and 3950x is on par and that's just cause it stops scaling after about 10 cores. Use timespy extreme and the gap will widen with the 3950x scoring significantly higher.

if you want something to test against, you can use my 3950x

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44754824?

scores just under 9500 points. A stock 10900k scores 6100 if I remember correctly, let's see how much closer they get with overclocks

kitfit1 said:
It scales fine with a 3950x : https://www.3dmark.com/spy/11735086
Click to expand...

Not really, high core count CPUs blow right past low core count CPUs in Extreme but in the free test they score the same after about 8 to 10 cores
 
Last edited:
Grim5 said:
Corect you must use Timspy extreme if you want proper cpu scaling.

mad you can see if you use the free timespy test it thinks the 10900k and 3950x is on par and that's just cause it stops scaling after about 10 cores. Use timespy extreme and the gap will widen with the 3950x scoring significantly higher.

if you want something to test against, you can use my 3950x

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44754824?

scores just under 9500 points. A stock 10900k scores 6100 if I remember correctly, let's see how much closer they get with overclocks



Not really, high core count CPUs blow right past low core count CPUs in Extreme but in the free test they score the same after about 8 to 10 cores
Click to expand...

Your right. I never knew that TS standard was so bad at scaling.

Just run this TS Extreme

Yours: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/44754824?
Mine: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/12180657

The only reason my cpu score is higher is because my all core is 4.4Ghz
 
FireTwo said:
sure fire me over a 3DMark Advanced Edition key then other wise ill go play some gtaV NaturalVision :D
Click to expand...

You've just parted with £540 for a cpu but can't be bothered to part with $30 for full access to the benchmark suite that tells you all you need to know and tweak about that shinny £540 cpu ?
In fact there are plenty of places to get it for even less than $30.
 
kitfit1 said:
You've just parted with £540 for a cpu but can't be bothered to part with $30 for full access to the benchmark suite that tells you all you need to know and tweak about that shinny £540 cpu ?
In fact there are plenty of places to get it for even less than $30.
Click to expand...

Don't forget the 'ripoff' z490 motherboard too! oh no wait same price as x570...
I knew that was coming, tbh this test will most likely favour the higher and MUCH higher amd threaded cpu's which is irrelevant to 99.9% of games of which I play. rather put £30 into a steam game.
 
FireTwo said:
Don't forget the 'ripoff' z490 motherboard too! oh no wait same price as x570...
I knew that was coming, tbh this test will most likely favour the higher and MUCH higher amd threaded cpu's which is irrelevant to 99.9% of games of which I play. rather put £30 into a steam game.
Click to expand...

lol same song diff day.

On a more productive side, what's your uncore at? ram at xmp or tune secondaries and tertiary timings? Both should help a ton with low fps as the cpu isn't stalled waiting on mem and ring operations when you need it the most.
 
kitfit1 said:
Mmmmmmmm, £24.66 actually.

Joined in 2015 with 132 posts....................................................suddenly starts posting in an Intel thread about a new CPU that no one is interested in.........................trying to justify buying said CPU..........................can't be bothered to part with £24.66 for the full 3dmark.
Now call me suspicious if you like, but that all smells to me like an Intel Plant into the forum as a sleeper. It certainly would not be the first time and no doubt, won't be the last.
Click to expand...

wtf....someone doesn't buy a software you want and now they're a shill?

This is actually embarrassing.
 
FireTwo said:
Don't forget the 'ripoff' z490 motherboard too! oh no wait same price as x570...
Click to expand...
I think most would come from the fact that it's a short lived socket/chipset and that its current comparative AMD processors don't need X570 - which is better featured than z490 with pcie 4 - and can also slot into the cheaper B450.

FireTwo said:
tbh this test will most likely favour the higher and MUCH higher amd threaded cpu's which is irrelevant to 99.9% of games of which I play.
Click to expand...
If that is the case, why didn't you just buy the 10600/10700k?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom