Soldato
Its really not, I had both cards briefly before I sold the amd one, testing it before sending. There was blurring with FreeSync on, that had completely gone with gsync compatible turned on now...Placebo.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Its really not, I had both cards briefly before I sold the amd one, testing it before sending. There was blurring with FreeSync on, that had completely gone with gsync compatible turned on now...Placebo.
Navi/RDNA is actually better in that review then I was expecting (besides the Wolfenstein result), it's power draw is lower then the new 2070 super. I wonder if this will be repeated in other reviews.
Its really not, I had both cards briefly before I sold the amd one, testing it before sending. There was blurring with FreeSync on, that had completely gone with gsync compatible turned on now...
They should just cough up the 5950xt and flop their manliness on the table and get it doneNavi/RDNA is actually better in that review then I was expecting (besides the Wolfenstein result), it's power draw is lower then the new 2070 super. I wonder if this will be repeated in other reviews.
Too many heated discussing going on in ryzen 3000, something super and navi threads, getting confused, sorry mateReplied to this in your other thread, rather than derail this one.
Performance looks pretty strong apart from Wolfenstein, not sure what's happening there.
One of 2 things happening.
Either they turned on Adaptive shading, which boosts Turing performance. Or more likely, Navi doesn't like Vulkun
Performance looks pretty strong apart from Wolfenstein, not sure what's happening there.
Can't be. Commentators here (who surely know what they're talking about) have been saying that it's twice the price hence 5700 "must be" £400+ to break evenTSMC says 7NM is cheaper than 16NM:
https://twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/1146417926481874944
Can't be. Commentators here (who surely know what they're talking about) have been saying that it's twice the price hence 5700 "must be" £400+ to break even
TSMC says 7NM is cheaper than 16NM:
https://twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/1146417926481874944
On that note, it pains me to say it but a 2080 on my FreeSync monitor is actually smoother than my Radeon 7 was...
Thanks. Think I'll have to pull the trigger on that one then.The one that goes for 99 quid probably won't drop further.
EG 27" QHD 144hz 1ms Gaming MonitorWhich monitor?
Yes that was the deal that was driving my thinking.Some are on offer at the moment. Bought an ASUS 570 for around £99 this morning to replace this r9 380 now that the fans have decided to stop working on it..
I wonder how poor the drivers are for Navi right now?
It's definitely a big question mark & if I was in the market for Navi I'd be waiting on that before buying.