Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Being MSI they will be the ones to avoid - The recommendation has to be wait for the sapphire cards right?
I would wager that the Gigabyte Windforce
will be the one to get although, the MSI gaming X is a two slot solution.
The Sapphire 5700XT Toxic will be the daddy card but i think we are in for a wait.
Sapphire is excellent for their AIB cooler solution.Yeah MSI are pretty rubbish on AMD, Sapphire and Powercolor are usually strongest in AiB cooling.
They are OK, what people mean is Sapphire and Powercolor solutions are simply superior.
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 64- for me the best air-cooled card I have ever owned.
Built quality, look and weight.
I would wait for Sapphire what the can do with Navii.
Is 5700 locked to 1800mhz on core by AMD?
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 64- for me the best air-cooled card I have ever owned.
Agreed, stunning card
Any news on AIB cards?
Scott Kelman (VP & GM Radeon) said:Hey all, Custom AIB designs will be hitting the market ~mid August.
Also, since I know there are a lot of threads on this blower design:
The Radeon group historically has had a bad reputation of producing product launch charts that didn’t match up to real world performance. Love it or hate it the blower allowed us to guarantee performance in every system to match our launch charts. Not everyone cools their PC as good as a reviewer and definitely not as good as some of the pictures you guys have shared. It was my goal to clean all of this up so that you can trust our performance you hear from us on stage.
But the feedback over the past few weeks has been really good for us to read. Going forward:
1). If blower design are used also offer dual/tri-axial options at launch for the enthusiasts. I like this idea. 2). Have reviews hit before shelf date (working on this with team) 3). Keep jebaiting NV - easily done.
Keep posting guys. I’m reading.
Scott
Everytime I see a comment like this I feel like it's extremely short-sighted and arrogant.
First off, your post assumes that AMD hasn't considered all of these arguments in advance, and still decided against it for various reasons.
Second, the Nvidia argument is ridiculous; the theory is that because Nvidia has more marketshare, that they have more to lose, but it's quite the opposite. Nvidia is in a position where people buy their GPUs on reputation alone, even when they are more expensive than better performing AMD cards in a particular price segment, and this was true even when they were using reference blowers. The vast majority of users know nothing about coolers or anything, they'll just buy whatever their friends tell them to buy, and that's usually Nvidia. The problem is that Nvidia can actually afford to dictate the market, because they're on top. If a Radeon card underperforms, people will blame AMD, because AMD is the underdog and doesn't have the same reputational advantages, whereas if a GeForce underperforms, many people won't even notice because there's a confirmation bias at play that makes them think it's better even when it's not. Nvidia is in a position where they can afford to play games, they have the leeway, whereas AMD cannot. This is basic human psychology.
Also, I can guarantee you, that the number of people with "poorly ventilated cases" are far more numerous than you think, your characterization of "some smuck somewhere" is really ignorant; you really think a multi-billion dollar company is deciding on the designs of their cards because of the needs of 1% of the market or something? I've got news for you, we on this subreddit, are the minority, the "shmucks" are the majority of consumers, not us. Another thing is that bargain hunters probably make up a bigger share of AMD's audience than Nvidia, and these types of users are likely to be people that may not have the best PC cooling.
Furthermore, Scott (OP) already said in their post that AMD would consider having axial fan options in addition to blower at launch, so what's the big deal here?
Lastly, it's just one more month until AIB cards so this entire whining about blowers is really pointless. Saying you don't like reference blowers is one thing, but acting like it's bad business is making quite a few claims about how corporate strategy works, and I'm honestly kind of annoyed at seeing a bunch of kids on reddit act like they understand product R&D and marketing better than people who get paid to do it. This launch is perfectly fine for AMD, and the launch of AIB cards next month will generate more news headlines for them which is good. And I guarantee you in 30ish days, no one will care or even remember all the **** people are stirring right now about blowers; hell, I'll be surprised if people even remember in a week, since they'll have moved on to the next thing to whine about.
i thought my Vega 64 was heavy... until I tried to pick up a Radeon 7. I swear that's made from an old railway girder. I needed to call a mate to help me lift it.Indeed, and coming with scaffolding so it wont bend
any ideas when the Non-Reference Cards are coming to market?
any ideas when the Non-Reference Cards are coming to market?
any ideas when the Non-Reference Cards are coming to market?
Subject to prices for partner cards...well i may aswell hang on until then cant see any point in grabbing a graphics card with blower style cooler on may aswell just shoot myself in the foot.