Suspended
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
Remember lads it's Spurs AMD, no counting of chickens just yet 
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Associate
I have only just realised the benchmark was on the 9070 not the 9070XT,so it could be 4080 performance after all
Last edited:
9070 (NOT the XT version)
Even original IGN article never said XT from what I saw.
AMD Radeon RX 9070 non-XT tested in COD BO6: 99 FPS on average at 4K Extreme settings without FSR - VideoCardz.com
AMD Radeon RX 9070 debuts in the world’s first (unofficial) test IGN found the PC and they tested it. Radeon RX 9070 in COD:BO6, Source: IGN AMD has not shared any performance figures for the RDNA4 series so far, so the performance of the new generation of Radeon graphics is anyone’s guess. It...videocardz.com
Maybe the speculation is all wrong?
7900 XTX - No direct replacement in the range, in line with the "no high end card" statement.
7900 XT - replaced by the 9070 XT as a 5070 Ti competitor.
7900 GRE/7800 XT - replaced by the 9070 as a 5070 competitor.
7700 XT - replaced by the 9060 XT as a 5060 Ti competitor.
7600 XT - replaced by the 9060 as a 5060 competitor.
The naming would make a lot sense if that were true TBF.
Soldato
Its been asked twice in the IGN comments if it was XT or non XT.. be good if IGN would actually respond to questions in their own article lol
Soldato
Changing the naming schemes last gen is now confusing these new cards expected performance. You'd expect this gens second tier cards to be around last gen high end if they were going to do a high end this time around, but they're not. So going by that logic, 9070XT should be around 7900XTX.
Can only hope
The real reviews cant come soon enough, for both sides lol
Associate
No way this card is less than £600 if the performance is around a 4080/5070ti
Soldato
Shame the damn case logo is covering it up, can we use some Nvidia AI to remove it? lol
Soldato
Shut up!
Associate
The 5070ti is like £750,so I can't see them pricing it £200+ lower,but we'll seeShut up!
I wonder if the reason AMD chickened out of announcing at CES was because they got rumours the much vaunted Nvidia Blackwell performance was all smoke and mirrors 4x fake frens nonsense.
So they are going to raise the prices of the RX 9070?
Real frames at real prices*
* the above post is pure sarcasm and not to be taken seriously.
Last edited:
its pretty nailed on they got wind of NVidias numbers and walked away to optimise more and save margins, but obviously thats my opinionI wonder if the reason AMD chickened out of announcing at CES was because they got rumours the much vaunted Nvidia Blackwell performance was all smoke and mirrors 4x fake frens nonsense.
So they are going to raise the prices of the RX 9070?
Real frames at real prices*
* the above post is pure sarcasm and not to be taken seriously.
Soldato
The way the £ against the $ is going right now I wouldnt be surprised.. £1 = $1.23 right now
I imagine those AIB designs with 3x8pin and 300W+ TDP are gonna be clocked to the balls. If the stock boost is around 3GHz, we could see the OC versions with 3.3 or 3.4GHz. At those speeds it would be zero surprise if it could hit 7900XTX performance.
Maybe AMD just finally let them fully unleash the GPUs unlike with RDNA3 where they were all held back through the power limits.
Last edited:
Soldato
All comes down to final performance results, and pricing. Anyone making a decision on what to buy without those is making a bad decision
I've had both AMD and Nvidia over the years (amongst others...), whoever makes the best card for the price I'm willing to pay gets the cash, simples, my 3080 10GB is starting to feel like a bit of a restriction at 1440p in some titles and I'd like to replace it.
I've got no qualms going either direction, and if people buy Nvidia BECAUSE or AMD BECAUSE, you're doing yourself a disservice. Good releases should be rewarded with sales, bad ones should languish on sale until the pricing/product is revised to the point its no longer a bad release.
I've had both AMD and Nvidia over the years (amongst others...), whoever makes the best card for the price I'm willing to pay gets the cash, simples, my 3080 10GB is starting to feel like a bit of a restriction at 1440p in some titles and I'd like to replace it.
I've got no qualms going either direction, and if people buy Nvidia BECAUSE or AMD BECAUSE, you're doing yourself a disservice. Good releases should be rewarded with sales, bad ones should languish on sale until the pricing/product is revised to the point its no longer a bad release.
Last edited:
^^^^
CoD is strong with AMD, so do remember that.
7800 XT is = to a 4070 Ti Super, you don't see that anywhere else... its one of very few games that are AMD optimised.
Last edited:
And as i have said, the interesting part is that the 7900xtx also gets high 90s in that bench mark. So pls ignore how the nvidia cards perform in black ops 6, it doesn't matter. If the 9070xt performs similarly to the 7900xtx in this game means it likely will in others.