Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
You don't need 10bit for HDR, my OLED screen handles it perfectly well with 8bit+FRC - multiple professional comparisons I've seen online found visible quality to be identical unless it's professional monitor for Hollywood with 500% magnification. In other words, a normal person will never notice any difference and it lowers bandwidth needs considerably.
Gonna stick to £799 for the 9070XT Nitro+ / XFX Mercury / Asus TUF and £899 for a Red Devil.
Gonna stick to £799 for the 9070XT Nitro+ / XFX Mercury / Asus TUF and £899 for a Red Devil.
Why would the Red Devil be 100 more than the others? Asus Tax alone puts them at the most expensive, and Sapphire is arguably the best AIB for AMD and has the highest build quality.
So market share at 5% in a year?!o'rly ?
![]()
MicroCenter lists Radeon RX 9070 series: RX 9070 XT starting at $699, RX 9070 at $649 - VideoCardz.com
AMD Radeon RX 9070 pricing on MicroCetner Are we getting closer to final pricing for the AMD Radeon RX 9070 series? Perhaps, perhaps we are looking at placeholders that have not been confirmed by AMD or any board partner. There’s no doubt that some of these prices are not final. There’s no way...videocardz.com
Well, ignoring HDR, I also mostly wrote about 10bit native VS 8bit+FRC.Thanks for the bonus input / correction of my reference to HDR (I ought to have just stuck with ‘10 bit native’).
I’m honestly not sure how this scales with DSC in Windows in real use but if you configure your monitor to use this way I would assume you could increase your fps limit before you hit your ‘DSC threshold’.
Some monitors also have an option for disabling DSC, so that’s handy - you should just be left with non-DSC options in Windows / NVCP.
I might be repeating myself, but I suspect availability (as in, cards in stock) will matter much more than exact pricing - people seem to have got used to scalpers everywhere, by now. But if NVIDIA at some point actually get to proper stock numbers, AMD will have to drop price to increase market share in any meaningful way.So market share at 5% in a year?!![]()
Cheap GDDR6 which is currently around £28 for 16gb at spot prices which no doubt AMD will get cheaper for bulk buys.$700 for 325mm die and 16gb ddr6 is big margins for amd and partners, so I expect the xt to be $699 and the none xt $649, OC aib cards north of these prices.
I might be repeating myself, but I suspect availability (as in, cards in stock) will matter much more than exact pricing - people seem to have got used to scalpers everywhere, by now. But if NVIDIA at some point actually get to proper stock numbers, AMD will have to drop price to increase market share in any meaningful way.
So basically RDNA4 yet again,so once all the fanbois and desperate people get their cards nobody is going to care. The AMD cards will be still be worse in RT,DLSS will be still be better and more widely used and more devs will optimise for Nvidia cards.
AMD had no VRAM advantage either. Just AMD playing it's part in the price fixing cartel now trying to push 60 series pricing to £500 or above.
They are basically selling an RX7900XT 16GB for similar money with maybe better RT which is behind Nvidia.
Also the fact that FSR4 is an RDNA4 exclusive seems more like artificial feature segmentation which Nvidia was accused off. No it makes sense if the price is true.
Let's see what they do on Friday. Ball is in your court AMD.
Oh... and the 5070 Ti and 5080 are only 15% apart, one would be a fool if one didn't think AMD used that 3 month delay looking at the 5080 as a target if it was already at 5070 Ti levels.
Nvidia drivers are better as is features and software support, that alone is worth a $200 premium vs a competative radeon.
Yes I was going to question that but figured I would rather keep my head down and await what are hopefully good reviews. Struggling with the driver aspect especially, thought that topic was dead and buried.Not sure how you're saying that with a straight face given how awful the 5000 series has been so far![]()
![]()
So basically RDNA4 yet again,so once all the fanbois and desperate people get their cards nobody is going to care. The AMD cards will be still be worse in RT,DLSS will be still be better and more widely used and more devs will optimise for Nvidia cards.
AMD had no VRAM advantage either. Just AMD playing it's part in the price fixing cartel now trying to push 60 series pricing to £500 or above.
They are basically selling an RX7900XT 16GB for similar money with maybe better RT which is behind Nvidia.
Also the fact that FSR4 is an RDNA4 exclusive seems more like artificial feature segmentation which Nvidia was accused off. No it makes sense if the price is true.
Let's see what they do on Friday. Ball is in your court AMD.