• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: ** The AMD VEGA Thread **

On or off the hype train?

  • (off) Train has derailed

    Votes: 207 39.2%
  • (on) Overcrowding, standing room only

    Votes: 100 18.9%
  • (never ever got on) Chinese escalator

    Votes: 221 41.9%

  • Total voters
    528
Status
Not open for further replies.
Calling me a fanboy now really? I don't even own AMD hardware at the moment, and in the last two years have own GTX 980, Titan X, and two 980Tis. There's only one person here coming off as a Fanboy D.P

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/28042612/

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/28130438/

NVIDIA Clearly told this reviewer that they wouldn't supply him the cards because they're not for gaming; and list it for their neural network cards, and deep learning.

https://youtu.be/EYlMrxIgoME?t=5m44s

That was more to do with him wanting two of the new Titans for free so he could replace two of the older Pascal Titans they'd already given him for free for a build he was doing, He ended up getting them because he throws his toy's out the pram and start's doing video's to make whoever won't give him hardware look like the bad guy's. Titans are for gaming and Nvidia promote them as the ultimate gaming card. Someone else said this a few days ago and I posted links to Nvidia's promotional stuff showing that they do and have done since day one, even when the card still had it's floating point or whatever it is intact.
 
Hey guys, I have a good friend who works at AMD, he said that vega will be faster than a 1080ti, as for providing evidence, why should I have to, people believe any old **** they see on the internet that doesn't have any credible source/evidence to backup their claim :D




If the card comes in at 1080 performance for <£400, I'll be happy as at least in the long run we will be getting some of AMD's finewine tuning :cool: Better that than having a company who don't put the same effort into optimization once their new products launch and then years down the line, those cards look pitiful compared to their competitors....

Could it be another case of get cards now and wait 12 months for performance improvements?

Which cards of AMDs took "12 months" for them to match their nvidia equivalents?
 
Found this comment on the videocardz article interesting:

This is not how Ryzen launched... This is very weird...

It sounds like they had a situation where early performance was great, and then during mass production they discovered a huge flaw that couldn't be fixed in microcode without a severe performance penalty.

So they scrapped the RX Vega launch and created a new stepping with the fix and some additional performance improvements that will be "RX Vega", and all the older, flawed stepping dies that were manufactured BEFORE the bug was discovered have been turned into the "Vega Frontier Edition" cards with reduced performance not suitable for "gaming" markets but decent enough for "pro" markets and are currently building inventory of the new stepping for RX Vega "gaming" cards.

This would explain Raja saying there will be RX Vega cards faster than the FE cards.

Could be pure speculation like 90% of info on Vega. Just thought it seemed very specific.
 
That was more to do with him wanting two of the new Titans for free so he could replace two of the older Pascal Titans they'd already given him for free for a build he was doing, He ended up getting them because he throws his toy's out the pram and start's doing video's to make whoever won't give him hardware look like the bad guy's. Titans are for gaming and Nvidia promote them as the ultimate gaming card. Someone else said this a few days ago and I posted links to Nvidia's promotional stuff showing that they do and have done since day one, even when the card still had it's floating point or whatever it is intact.

It's both, their press release to Anandtech and others constantly mentioned "Prosumer" as well, mentioned several times in their article based on the information NVIDIA gave them. I even linked to their own Deep Learning development page where they list the Xp for desktop use as their fastest card for deep neural network training. While they also market it as the flagship for gaming; and features the drivers for it.

Also I'd believe Jay in what they told him. Him blatantly lying about what NVIDIA told him would get him removed from the sampled list for future products; or just cut ties.

The card is a Prosumer card, it's sits in the middle of it all, while not excelling in the pro line. Just like the Frontier Edition. The difference with AMD is, they're refusing to show any game performance numbers; and like NVIDIA didn't sample consumer reviewers with the card.

It'll be interesting to see how it does in that area though; even with all this talk of the gaming drivers not being close to ready.

One test that doesn't care for drivers if 3D Mark. Whether it's Pro drivers, or Gaming; the result will be rather similar. So I hope someone with a Frontier Edition at least runs 3D Mark to see what the hardware can do.
As the Quadro M6000 and Titan X (Maxwell) pretty much scored the same.
 
GOOD NEWS EVERYONE!

Someone got their hands on a Frontier Edition, and we might get some gaming performance at 1080p. I wonder if Vega will suck at 1080p like the Fury line did.


https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6k0daw/dude_got_vega_fe_the_return/
lqjsC8e.png


7UU0Elc.jpg

CRMaiOn.gif

8i5tlAC.jpg
 
...
Well in their Q1 earnings and Investor call they told the people on record "Vega products" are launching H1. Very broad terms :/

This was just posted which confirms they did.

From the original locked thread "AMD VEGA confirmed for 2017 H1"


Will launch "Vega" for the enthusiast market in 1H 2017



14a35a5e64.png


I'm pretty sure when Doom demo was shown they again said Vega H1.


This has been discussed before. Can we just accept that Vega Gaming / Enthusiast / RX is late........for whatever reason(s) that I'm sure will become apparent at a later date. :)

You're right, They said it several times.
 
Found this comment on the videocardz article interesting:



Could be pure speculation like 90% of info on Vega. Just thought it seemed very specific.


It is interesting, possibly true, but no evidence.

What i irrefutable is this whole Vega Frontier Edition is absolutely the weirdest GPU launch in graphics card history. A card aimed at professionals but without certified professional drivers (perhaps because of the bug?) compared to a card that isn't supposed to be used for professional use. Zero official architecture details. No official reviews, just people having to go out and buy an FE card and bench themselves. Gaming Vega absolutely delayed regardless of what some people say. The most bizarre marketing video released since 3DFX. A water cooled verion that requires 75w mroe than an already power hungry 300w air cooled, despite the fact that water cooling usually reduced power consumption due to less electron leakage.
 
I cant believe we are still waiting, August now for the consumer ones yeah? at this rate Volta wont be far behind.
 
...
This was just posted which confirms they did.

You're right, They said it several times.

Yup, as mentioned Before AMD likely see Frontier Edition as their "Enthusiast" card, also part of their comparisons against the Titan Xp.

Really sucks for all consumers that just want a darn gaming card. Although that quote from Videocardz is also quite interesting. Might explain more of the delays along with drivers, and HBM2.

This is not how Ryzen launched... This is very weird...

It sounds like they had a situation where early performance was great, and then during mass production they discovered a huge flaw that couldn't be fixed in microcode without a severe performance penalty.

So they scrapped the RX Vega launch and created a new stepping with the fix and some additional performance improvements that will be "RX Vega", and all the older, flawed stepping dies that were manufactured BEFORE the bug was discovered have been turned into the "Vega Frontier Edition" cards with reduced performance not suitable for "gaming" markets but decent enough for "pro" markets and are currently building inventory of the new stepping for RX Vega "gaming" cards.

This would explain Raja saying there will be RX Vega cards faster than the FE cards.
 
The thing that worries me is that I am buying a new computer when Threadripper comes out (it'll either be a Threadripper system or an Intel X299 system depending on which is better when we have full information on Threadripper) so the date of purchasing my system is already set so I need to make a choice as to what to buy in the next couple of months. If AMD don't have a 1080TI competitor I might be forced to buy another Nvidia GPU even though Vega might be a better fit for an AMD Threadripper system. I really want this system to last for 5 years (perhaps with 1 GPU upgrade in the middle) so I really want the best when I buy it.
 
It is interesting, possibly true, but no evidence.

What i irrefutable is this whole Vega Frontier Edition is absolutely the weirdest GPU launch in graphics card history. A card aimed at professionals but without certified professional drivers (perhaps because of the bug?) compared to a card that isn't supposed to be used for professional use. Zero official architecture details. No official reviews, just people having to go out and buy an FE card and bench themselves. Gaming Vega absolutely delayed regardless of what some people say. The most bizarre marketing video released since 3DFX. A water cooled verion that requires 75w mroe than an already power hungry 300w air cooled, despite the fact that water cooling usually reduced power consumption due to less electron leakage.

Only one answer to this, ironically provided by yourself.

It is interesting, possibly true, but no evidence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom