Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Although no one will officially confirm this, AMD Vega was postponed few times (according to AIBs). The reason for the delay is not related to any yield issues, but performance. AMD is clearly trying to boost it by optimizing software to the very last moment. This might also explain missing reviews of Frontier (even from the most trusted tech sites). The reality is that the very first person to provide gaming benchmarks of Vega Frontier is probably going to have the most popular content in months.
Rumor: VEGA has been delayed, but not because of yield issues but because of performance issues
https://videocardz.com/70511/amd-radeon-vega-frontier-features-gaming-mode
Seems like AMD's driver team hasn't been getting any sleep for the last 6 months. Which matches up to the problem mentioned by Raja during the AMA. Will be interesting to see what they can accomplish.
Looks like Vega will indeed be pretty power hungry, AMD are recommending an 850w PSU with Vega FE;
http://pro.radeon.com/en-us/product/radeon-vega-frontier-edition/
![]()
Rumor: VEGA has been delayed, but not because of yield issues but because of performance issues
https://videocardz.com/70511/amd-radeon-vega-frontier-features-gaming-mode
Seems like AMD's driver team hasn't been getting any sleep for the last 6 months. Which matches up to the problem mentioned by Raja during the AMA. Will be interesting to see what they can accomplish.
So, my take on this is:
My suspicion is that Vega with all its changes (NCU, HBCC, new geometry processors, etc) has resulted in extensive changes being needed on the software front. The gaming drivers are likely 'just not ready' and AMD still hopes it will be able to unlock considerably more performance.
- ...
- It seems to me (just guessing) that even though 'the compute performance is there', the flip-side is that 'the gaming performance is not quite there'.
- As a result, they're showing the card doing CAD work, but asking sites not to bench it for games.
They just don't want to put themselves into the same situation the RX480 was where launch-day drivers did a lot of injustice to the card's true potential.
...
It's not surprising that a brand new architecture needs brand new drivers and optimisations. What is surprising is that they haven't sorted it yet!
Why will it?Q2 only has 3 days left. Vega gaming will be disappointingly late.
Q2 only has 3 days left. Vega gaming will be disappointingly late.
I think Vega FE technically keeps their promise true for a Q2 launch, with the RX coming out a month later.
Why are there no reviews? Did reviewers not have these days before?
Yes technically, but I think most people were under the impression that Vega Gaming was going to be released in Q2 as AMD didn't say otherwise until they announced the FE launch date.
It appears no FE cards have been sent out for review. Review sites are buying there own if they want to review them.
They did, they said Vega H1. They didn't differentiate between the FX and the RX until the FE launch date was announced for June and the RX at Siggraph.AMD never said they would have the gaming editions of Vega available in Q2 either.
Well it explains the delay, the lack of gaming benchmarks and why AMD have been so guarded regarding gaming performance.Rumor: VEGA has been delayed, but not because of yield issues but because of performance issues
https://videocardz.com/70511/amd-radeon-vega-frontier-features-gaming-mode
Seems like AMD's driver team hasn't been getting any sleep for the last 6 months. Which matches up to the problem mentioned by Raja during the AMA. Will be interesting to see what they can accomplish.
And Vega has been launched in H1. No its not the card lots of people wanted but it meets what they saidThey did, they said Vega H1. They didn't differentiate between the FX and the RX until the FE launch date was announced for June and the RX at Siggraph.
Well it explains the delay, the lack of gaming benchmarks and why AMD have been so guarded regarding gaming performance.