On the plus side, not many people can complain that their 980ti has depreciated by over £2500 XDAhh ok, you paid that way.. thought it was a tad much for a graphic cards otherwise..
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Poll: ** The AMD VEGA Thread **
- Thread starter TNA
- Start date
- Status
Better to calculate flops rather than to use marketed ones, Nvidia always use the rated base or boost clocks when in fact they tend to go higher. the 1080Ti would actually be around 12.9-13.1 Tflops since they tend to run ~1800MHz. While vega will do 12.6 - 13.1 if it is hitting ~1550MHz. Vega FE was doing ~1440 MHz for 11.7 Tflops.
But then gaming performance is dependant on drivers and other hardware features in the architecture, some of which are not enabled yet in Vega FE.
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 3,761
- Location
- here
Where was this taken from and why are some of the names missing the "2" is HMB2 whilst their product code says "HBM2"? Seems very bogus.
It's not bogus but the prices look odd - the limited edition is the same as the standard. They're from a UK supplier (can't mention the name as it's a competitor).
Posted earlier, probably best to ignore.
I paid 2.5btc for a Fury pro.
That'll be the Volta 1170 price, you wait and seeAhh ok, you paid that way.. thought it was a tad much for a graphic cards otherwise..
Ok got something
Timespy Vega RX 1750mhz 7 579
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6skazr/time_spy_radeontm_rx_vega_1750_mhz/
1080@1974mhz more or less 7 448
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1073468
1650mhz with [email protected] 7 209
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/2192971
And my 980ti@1485/8000 with 1700x for comparison 6 290
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1874394
Timespy Vega RX 1750mhz 7 579
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6skazr/time_spy_radeontm_rx_vega_1750_mhz/
1080@1974mhz more or less 7 448
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1073468
1650mhz with [email protected] 7 209
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/2192971
And my 980ti@1485/8000 with 1700x for comparison 6 290
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1874394
Last edited:
Not too bad but considering a good 1080 will score around 8k gfx on that bench and a good Ti will score around 11k.
It's still a way off considering it's rumoured price. There are other questions too like overclockability (is 1750mhz it's max OC?) and temps etc. Was this the liquid version?
Well i'm sure its the Liquid version remember FE overlock with LC on it ?? It was 17xxrange also and at that overclock it was what ?? ~440 watts power draw....
https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graph...-16GB-Liquid-Cooled-Review/Overclocking-and-C
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,639
- Location
- London
Somewhat worried tho for Vega's big features. HBCC, FP16 and DSBR. If these don't get any traction amongst Devs then it's gonna contain a lot if redundant hardware.
Equally if these do so development by Devs in games, where does this leave Nvidia?
A) They are the biggest player in the PC market. Will leave a lot of players in the lurch. And do Devs want to do that.
B) I'd imagine it's WAY to late for Nvidia to get any of this stuff in to consumer Volta if they wanted. You would think this is Nvidia's issue not AMD's but as Nvidia own the PC market with out Nvidia supporting these features it's only ever going to be niche and in a few games surely?
Equally if these do so development by Devs in games, where does this leave Nvidia?
A) They are the biggest player in the PC market. Will leave a lot of players in the lurch. And do Devs want to do that.
B) I'd imagine it's WAY to late for Nvidia to get any of this stuff in to consumer Volta if they wanted. You would think this is Nvidia's issue not AMD's but as Nvidia own the PC market with out Nvidia supporting these features it's only ever going to be niche and in a few games surely?
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,639
- Location
- London
Somewhat worried tho for Vega's big features. HBCC, FP16 and DSBR. If these don't get any traction amongst Devs then it's gonna contain a lot if redundant hardware.
Equally if these do see development by Devs in games, where does this leave Nvidia?
A) They are the biggest player in the PC market. Will leave a lot of players in the lurch. And do Devs want to do that.
B) I'd imagine it's WAY to late for Nvidia to get any of this stuff in to consumer Volta if they wanted. You would think this is Nvidia's issue not AMD's but as Nvidia own the PC market with out Nvidia supporting these features it's only ever going to be niche and in a few games surely?
Equally if these do see development by Devs in games, where does this leave Nvidia?
A) They are the biggest player in the PC market. Will leave a lot of players in the lurch. And do Devs want to do that.
B) I'd imagine it's WAY to late for Nvidia to get any of this stuff in to consumer Volta if they wanted. You would think this is Nvidia's issue not AMD's but as Nvidia own the PC market with out Nvidia supporting these features it's only ever going to be niche and in a few games surely?
True Audio anyone ?? Mantle ?? At lest Mantle gave us Volcan and Dx12... that barely any games use ...
You sure? Obviously older games don't use them but I thought their traction with new games was pretty good?
- Status