• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***The DigitalFoundry Face Off Thread***

shankly1985

shankly1985

shankly1985

Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2011
Posts
20,680
Location
The KOP
Feel these guys deserve there own thread, personally I don't think they is a better channel out atm doing a better job than these guys.

I'll continue to post latest video about GPU vs GPU performance. Feel free to post your own from these guys.

Inside Digital Foundry: How We Measure PC Performance

First up Crossfire vs SLI @4k with selection of games
Games Tested:

00:42 - Battlefield 4
01:38 - Shadow of Mordor
02:15 - Grand Theft Auto 5
04:12 - Assassin's Creed Unity
05:19 - Far Cry 4
06:22 - Ryse: Son of Rome
06:57 - Crysis 3


The Division 970 vs 390

Core i7 5960X Eight-Core Overclock/R9 Fury X CrossFire Benchmarks - CPU Bottlenecks
Street fighter 5


Hitman PC Beta GTX 970 vs R9 390 Frame-Rate Test
Farcry primal 970 vs 390


Quantum Break PC Performance: GTX 970 vs R9 390 - What Went Wrong?

Dark Souls 3 GTX 970 vs R9 390/GTX 960 vs R9 380 Gameplay Frame-Rate Tests

Has i expected an updated version. Am lead to believe this was an issue with OpenGL feature pack. Nvidia is running 4.5 while AMD is running 4.3 with Features. So I guess they was an issue with a extension?

Doom Dev - @idSoftwareTiago
It's using 4.3 with extensions from 4.4 and 4.5. There is no advantage in initializing a 4.5 context.





Shocking Game.




Nvidia GTX 970 vs AMD R9 390 1080p/ 1440p Benchmarks [DX11/ DX12]
 
Last edited:
Dygaza said:
Shankly, could you put the newest Fury X crossfire test in OP aswell? I think it shows scaling with different resolutions very well, and also highlights cpu bound limits in various games and resolutions.
Click to expand...

Done was meant to do it yesterday and forgot thanks for reminding me :D
 
It's not just about getting a tiny bit of fps over the competition...

These guys so much more then anyone else that I know off..
Take note of the more important frame latency it's this what makes a game playable and smooth..

So far they have been very non bias imo apart from I would have liked to see the 390 overclocked also in the 970 vs 390 I have nothing bad to say about them.
 
JediFragger said:
Wow, another nice win for AMD there! Hopefully it's just a driver issue with the nVidia lineup :)
Click to expand...

Tbh I would say all users stay well away.
Even though amd is ahead shoddy performance is still there. The game for some reason on 60hz is locked at 50fps lol

I tell you what Microsoft is killing pc gaming with this horrible windows store junk.

I will say though excellent work from amd release drivers etc showing again there leading the way in DirectX12.
 
Yeah even in the video the 970 was in high 20s.. With Nvidia driver crashing I would say this game need another driver from nvidia to boost performance.
50fps cap at 60hz from what I told if you using 120hz or 144hz you can go higher but the inconstant frame rate is horrible
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom