"The genuis of Charles Darwin" C4 now

Dawkins stated more than once that evolution has no purpose but offered no evidence for why he believes this. Then went on to state that our purpose is to pass on successful genes to our offspring and that we are in fact a vehicle for successful genes to survive.

I find this slightly confusing...
 
Dawkins stated more than once that evolution has no purpose but offered no evidence for why he believes this. Then went on to state that our purpose is to pass on successful genes to our offspring and that we are in fact a vehicle for successful genes to survive.

I find this slightly confusing...

We are all temporary vehicles to pass on genes, we will all die quickly (relatively), but our genes will survive. I believe his no purpose statement is to get us thinking outside the box, as we all feel want purpose. i feel insecure without purpose, whether it's a wife, career or playing computer games.

If we have no purpose what's the point? Yet that's evolution and why most dislike it.
 
We are all temporary vehicles to pass on genes, we will all die quickly (relatively), but our genes will survive. I believe his no purpose statement is to get us thinking outside the box, as we all feel want purpose. i feel insecure without purpose, whether it's a wife, career or playing computer games.

If we have no purpose what's the point? Yet that's evolution and why most dislike it.

I understand that but why does he state evolution has no purpose, what evidence is there for this?
 
I understand that but why does he state evolution has no purpose, what evidence is there for this?

Because it doesn't? it's not conscious, it doesn't have a long term goal, it's just a collection of random mutations that happened to work out. (and very often didn't)
 

that experiment just seem that there are limited solutions to the limited and i identical environment, so it's to be expected that they all come up with something similar.

Remember the random mutations that aren't beneficial, just die off, well they might not be beneficial and survive just depends how its competitors change.
 
Quite an enjoyable programme - thank God (:D) there was none of the usual creationist/intelligent design versus evolution aggression.

looking forward to next week.
 
they're random!

It's amusing that so many dislike the reality of life, science and evo, yet we all want prada, bmw, booze and wags. I guess that's the reality of life in 2008.:(

how exactly will a deep understanding of evolution, help you get to work?
 
Back
Top Bottom