The Graveyard of the damned

[Neil79]

 

[ElDude]

Why the title? I see no obvious reason.

I'm not sure I like any of the angles you've taken the shots at. The second isn't bad, but the two graves on the right are lost in the background.

 

[Neil79]

Why the title? I see no obvious reason.

I'm not sure I like any of the angles you've taken the shots at. The second isn't bad, but the two graves on the right are lost in the background.

Oh aren't you a happy chappy , its supposed to be like that

About the title , its called fun try it sometime

 

[ElDude]

I see you take criticism well.

Having a shot where the foreground is lost in the background is not a good thing.

I'd at least attempt to dodge/burn that area to make the crosses more apparent.

 

[Neil79]

I see you take criticism well.

Having a shot where the foreground is lost in the background is not a good thing.

I'd at least attempt to dodge/burn that area to make the crosses more apparent.

I do take criticsm but its how you put it across that needs work , read back through your original post and see the mistakes you made

 

[robmiller]

I do take criticsm but its how you put it across that needs work , read back through your original post and see the mistakes you made

It's perfectly constructive criticism Not everything needs to be sugar-coated, you know.

 

[Neil79]

It's perfectly constructive criticism Not everything needs to be sugar-coated, you know.

His second post is perfectly constructive , explaining in detail how to improve the shot.

Having a shot where the foreground is lost in the background is not a good thing.

I'd at least attempt to dodge/burn that area to make the crosses more apparent.

His first post isnt , firstly nagging about a thread title , then mentioning the angles He doesn't like and no detail about improving the lost graves in the background. I had no problem with his second post but his first sucked.

Why the title? I see no obvious reason.

I'm not sure I like any of the angles you've taken the shots at. The second isn't bad, but the two graves on the right are lost in the background.

Lets just agree to disagree , shall we

 

[robmiller]

He doesn't think the title suits the work, it's a totally valid criticism and one I'd agree with.

 

[Neil79]

He doesn't think the title suits the work, it's a totally valid criticism and one I'd agree with.

Ok next time i'll put the graveyard of flowers and pretty things , will probably suit it then

 

[Irish_Tom]

I think the title came from the other thread where someone said one of the shots had come straight out of 'children of the damned' peeps need to chillax a bit in here.

I like them mate, they go well with the other set.

Panzer

 

[Neil79]

Thankyou Panzer , made me feel much better

 

[ichabod crane]

i think there a bit lifeless to be honest don't overly think graveyards make good pictures unless there very sinister looking or highlighting a strong background like a sunset, but generally shots of gravestones don't do it for me, not a lot of detail i any of the aspects of the shot or any significant features

 

[Neil79]

i think there a bit lifeless to be honest don't overly think graveyards make good pictures unless there very sinister looking or highlighting a strong background like a sunset, but generally shots of gravestones don't do it for me, not a lot of detail i any of the aspects of the shot or any significant features

Well atleast you're honest and explain why you don't like them

I find them amazing , just like churches another reason why i post them on the flickr graveyard and churches groups . People here seem to get hardon's *wink* over people pictures though they rarely do anything for me , so personal preference hehe

 

[ichabod crane]

there is other stuff than just people pictures, but yes personal preference. But your shots are pretty well captured and the conversions to black and white out work well apart from the two crosses blending into the hedge but you could live with that