Associate
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2018
- Posts
- 1,304
Out Today
Deffo worth a watch but I can smell the bias from here, hopefully im utterly wrong.
there's no way to sidestep that so naturally people on the right are probably going to find the documentary biased against 'their side' because it mainly focusses on 2 right wing campaigns benefiting from using Cambridge Analytica.
Because people don't want to admit they were duped by fake/lying ads etc. There's plenty of outrage over Brexit, you just have to look at the mess parliament is in right now.Why is there no daily outrage in the UK over the brexit result and the clear admission and influence that CA had in the refurendum?
Because people don't want to admit they were duped by fake/lying ads etc. There's plenty of outrage over Brexit, you just have to look at the mess parliament is in right now.
I haven't watched the film yet but I'm sure it's fascinating.
I watched this short TED talk yesterday in fact, from the journalist who published the CA leaks from Christopher Wylie. I'm guessing she features in this film?
Yep she's it itBecause people don't want to admit they were duped by fake/lying ads etc. There's plenty of outrage over Brexit, you just have to look at the mess parliament is in right now.
I haven't watched the film yet but I'm sure it's fascinating.
I watched this short TED talk yesterday in fact, from the journalist who published the CA leaks from Christopher Wylie. I'm guessing she features in this film?
https://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/johnson-government-using-cambridge-analytica-strategies/Why is there no daily outrage in the UK over the brexit result and the clear admission and influence that CA had in the refurendum?
All of this is garbage. Kaiser first worked in politics as an intern on the 2008 Barack Obama campaign, helping its social media team, but The Great Hack implies that she ran his whole Facebook operation. She is not the first person to pump a small role in that campaign into a career-making calling card;
..
Here’s the bigger issue: When it comes to voters’ decisions about their choice of candidate, most forms of paid political persuasion, including TV ads, online ads, mailers, phone calls, and door knocking, have no discernible effect in terms of changing people’s minds. That’s the conclusion of a careful meta-review of 49 field experiments looking at general election campaigns, published by political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman in the American Political Science Review in 2018. They write, “The circumstances in which citizens’ political choices appear manipulable appear to be exceedingly rare in the elections that matter most.” Of course, all the people making money from selling the tools of political persuasion don’t want anyone to know this. Why spoil a good racket?