Slyvester said:Why not just link to a bigger resolution of the image in the old 800x600 thread? I can see these pages taking forever to load if everyone starts posting 1900x1200 images.
yhack said:Normally I cba to click anything and would rather scroll down and have a look at the pictures.
This is going to turn into a resolution fanboy thread!
They said too big in the other thread5bjoshua said:I think this a good idea!
Jihad, pics to small, please delete
Thumbnails? ImageShack will even make them for you automatically if you want.Jihad said:and Ulfhedjinn, well mainly because when I resize my pictures to 800x600 it doesn't turn out right. Plus some others wanted a bigger thread so may aswell try.
If I feel that a thread is a pointless waste of space then I reserve my right to say so.LabR@t said:if you don't like it don't come in to view it simple, I like the idea of it myself.
Maybe it's just me but about 90% of the time after clicking a thumbnail it takes ages for the full version to show up.Ulfhedjinn said:Thumbnails? ImageShack will even make them for you automatically if you want.
About the same length of time it takes to load a full-sized version from the same hosting server in the first place.Jihad said:Maybe it's just me but about 90% of the time after clicking a thumbnail it takes ages for the full version to show up.
Ulfhedjinn said:The 800x600 MAXIMUM screenshot thread (56k no no)
Start Date: 5th Jul 2005, 11:23
Number Of Replies: 9,640
Number Of Views: 556,875
Five-star thread.
So, what's broken about this obviously hugely successful thread that you feel you can improve on?