The Intel Quadcore Database

Her we go then. I know you have been waiting for me to publish a result in here :)

CPU: QX9650
Revison C0
FPO# L739A640
Clockspeed: 4303 Mhz
Vcore (under load in windows) 1.432
Vid (core temp) Unknown
Motherboard: Asus Maximus Formula SE
Cooling: Water (single loop doing CPU, 2xGPU's and Chipset)
Thermal paste used : AS5
CPU Temp : 67c (average of the 4 cores - the Everest combined looks low)

prime_4300_8hr_small.jpg


Link to Full Size Image

I really hope thats everything, i so i dont fancy doing that test again for awhile... its a bit dull and very long :)
 
Last edited:
SimonMaltby said:
Her we go then. I know you have been waiting for me to publish a result in here :)

CPU: QX9650
Revison C0
FPO# L739A640
Clockspeed: 4303 Mhz
Vcore (under load in windows) 1.432
Vid (core temp) Unknown
Motherboard: Asus Maximus Formula SE
Cooling: Water (single loop doing CPU, 2xGPU's and Chipset)
Thermal paste used : AS5
CPU Temp : 67c (average of the 4 cores - the Everest combined looks low)



I really hope thats everything, i so i dont fancy doing that test again for awhile... its a bit dull and very long :)
Click to expand...

Nice clock.

But I feel,and no disrespect to you.That penryn needs its own table.
 
maybe when a few more Penryn chips are benched, a new table can be made, but not yet, no point in having a table with just one entry!

EDIT- @ WEBBO, I've now got my FPO, can you update me in the table please?


*L727A954*
 
easyrider said:
That penryn needs its own table.
Click to expand...


Servo said:
Problem is, topic says quad core, and thats what the chip is.
Click to expand...


young said:
maybe when a few more Penryn chips are benched, a new table can be made, but not yet, no point in having a table with just one entry!
Click to expand...

Easy rider does make a valid point. It would be nice to differentiate between the 45nm and 65nm chips within the existing table.

Maybe it would be worth considering starting a 45nm table prior to the uptake of 45nm? As the over clocks will be submitted and added to the present 65nm table. By starting the 45nm table now would be a time saving device as preparation has taken place in advance to accommodate these 45nm over clocks.

It would also compare/ validate 45nm vs 45nm chips as the present table compares/ validates the 65nm vs 65nm (GO and B3). Albeit both 45/65nm are quad
cores.
 
Last edited:
easyrider said:
You can't have a 45nm part in the same table as a 65nm part.
Click to expand...


By that logic you should have had a split for G0 q6600 then??? where would you stop splitting the database?

I think you are wrong... When G0 came out every thing else took a back seat. Also, currently how many .45's are there going to be in the table 1 or 2 :( and when the normal non Qx versions come out - will they get to the same clock speed with the lower multi's - who knows.

Please think twice before splitting.
 
CPU - Q6600
Revison - G0
FPO# - L38B082
Clockspeed - 3798 mhz
Vcore (under load in windows) - 1.45v
Vid (core temp) - 1.2625
Motherboard - ASUS Maximus X38 non-SE
Cooling - water (Fuzion + MCW30 on a PA120.3)
Thermal paste used - MX2
CPU Temp - ~46-48c small fft/42-44c high fft
Lapped - Not yet :)

i'll be back for more later i hope (looking at volts + temps) but please pencil me in for now :)

3800145vux5.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom