Associate
Might be overthinking this, but, in my current work in progress build, I ensured my bottom rad - one of three - has an underside port which I am using as the ‘lowest’ point on the loop.
But, one of the three rads is vertically mounted with both of it’s two ports located at the top. So this rad will represent the part of the loop that is undrainable without basically turning the case upside down.
I know there are ways to flush out old fluid by replacing it with new, by cycling fresh fluid through the loop over a few turns. But this is intensive as a workflow.
Maybe I should have got a cross flow type for this vertical rad…
Any thoughts on this? I know I probably won’t be the first with this issue. Thanks guys
But, one of the three rads is vertically mounted with both of it’s two ports located at the top. So this rad will represent the part of the loop that is undrainable without basically turning the case upside down.
I know there are ways to flush out old fluid by replacing it with new, by cycling fresh fluid through the loop over a few turns. But this is intensive as a workflow.
Maybe I should have got a cross flow type for this vertical rad…
Any thoughts on this? I know I probably won’t be the first with this issue. Thanks guys