• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Official Intel Ice Lake CPU

TOR - The Onion Ring aka Project Anonymity.

A Firefox based browser that, among numerous plugins such as no script, etc. routes your traffic through proxies in an attempt to hide the originator.



M.
 
I think we'll see some decent laptops with it. Just hope we can have some that can cool the thing, and aren't 'thin & lighted' beyond the limits of cooling, like every other modern laptop.
The naming scheme is beyond terrible though i7-1068G7 > i5-1035G7 > i7-1060G7 is order of performance, says hardwarecanucks. Get a better way to differentiate the ULV parts, than 4th number... :|
 
They have been feeding me gpus on my cpu for ages now and everytime i think to myself but why?

99% of gamers unless they have an issue or there gpu has not arrived use a gpu why do they insist on pushing one onto the cpu increasing heat/powerdraw/price it honestly boggles the mind.
 
trisp said:
They have been feeding me gpus on my cpu for ages now and everytime i think to myself but why?

99% of gamers unless they have an issue or there gpu has not arrived use a gpu why do they insist on pushing one onto the cpu increasing heat/powerdraw/price it honestly boggles the mind.
Click to expand...

Because 99% of their market is not gamers, and also mostly not desktop.

They offer a solution which is perfect for the vast majority of the broader market.

As much as folks around here love to kick Intel, you can't argue with their staggering profits. They know and target the broader market perfectly.
 
MaXxBoulton said:
This means nothing for desktop computers. Intel still as nothing to offer other than skylake rehash..
Click to expand...

it doesnt matter if they faster than amd counter parts at 95 percent of everything in daily use. i dont get why people get so ate up about it.
 
~>Dg<~ said:
i dont get why people get so ate up about it.
Click to expand...

People are talking like this makes a difference to the desktop range. It doesn't.

I just got a new Intel system am not an amd fanboy I just like to point out that here and now Intel as no plans that matter.

As anyone had an ice lake cpu in there hand and used one? Intel like amd and good and throwing numbers around that again mean nothing until you have the cpu and use it yourself
 
This looks like a massive disappointment. Reading AT preview, despite 18% IPC increase (which may be nebulous itself), they've lost 18% clockspeed going from 14nm++ to 10nm. So I read that actual performance from Whiskey Lake to Ice Lake is 3.5%...and that's Intel's own figure, reality might be less than that even.

What a disaster 10nm has been for them.
 
Boot_Loop said:
This looks like a massive disappointment. Reading AT preview, despite 18% IPC increase (which may be nebulous itself), they've lost 18% clockspeed going from 14nm++ to 10nm. So I read that actual performance from Whiskey Lake to Ice Lake is 3.5%...and that's Intel's own figure, reality might be less than that even.

What a disaster 10nm has been for them.
Click to expand...

Was about to write something similar before I read this..

I didnt even think it was possible to lose clock speed while decreasing the nm size? I thought at the bare minimum it would stay the same, really surprised me to see than clockspeeds are lower
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom