Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
hows it losing????and its 8 big cores and 16 of the little ones vs AMD's 16 big cores.Really wonder how Intel managed to screw the 13th gen up, How on earth is a 24core losing to a 16 core
And yet the single core is so good.
Ashamed of you Intel, Was hoping to see a EYPC killer in the server space but not going by this.
hows it losing????and its 8 big cores and 16 of the little ones vs AMD's 16 big cores.
8 + 16 is still 24 ! if the big, medium or small was Intel's design choice, it's not doing very well against a 16 core at the end of the day. Lets be honest with the power it uses in multi threaded it should be decimating AMD.hows it losing????and its 8 big cores and 16 of the little ones vs AMD's 16 big cores.
AMD's not so big cores are closer in size to Intel's little cores, the P Cores are 3X the size of AMD's cores.hows it losing????and its 8 big cores and 16 of the little ones vs AMD's 16 big cores.
8 + 16 is still 24 ! if the big, medium or small was Intel's design choice, it's not doing very well against a 16 core at the end of the day. Lets be honest with the power it uses in multi threaded it should be decimating AMD.
People generally buy a CPUs with 10 - 24 cores to do actual work not play games for the most part. Leave that to the 6/8 core brethren.13900k is a better gaming CPU, that can't be argued. Though for most everything else AMD and Intel are very competitive, they're both great CPU's.
Are you ####ing serious? Stop it.@RavenXXX2 likely won't update this thread as it would put Intel on top of MT, which is a shame. Perhaps someone else with the time and willingness to update both AMD and Intel scores would like to start a new official thread?
Think he's just trolling, as you clearly have the top score @Nickolp1974, with a 13900k.
whatever there size there both great cpu's, and neither is really losing out to the other.AMD's not so big cores are closer in size to Intel's little cores, the P Cores are 3X the size of AMD's cores.
Agreed.whatever there size there both great cpu's, and neither is really losing out to the other.
Are you sure? over 102K here....
****** The Official OCUK Cinebench R23 Benchmark Thread ******
In cbr23? 12900k and ks were the fastest chips out of the box. I see stock 5950x above 12900k the stock 12900k are down the list first one placed at 35th Doesn't stock mean out of the box ? Single core intel winsforums.overclockers.co.uk
Are you "" serious? Stop it.
Yes I am. @RavenXXX2 is very quick to update the thread when AMD are ahead (within 2 hours after AMD_Matt posted his score) - it's clear why he won't update mainstream CPU scores when Intel are ahead.
Perhaps he feels if he doesn't update it, it doesn't make it true
I haven't seen him post at all for a while, have you? People have their own lives, don't be so cynical.
I hope he is good and well, i'm sure you do too, right?
Today at 14:03....I haven't seen him post at all for a while, have you? People have their own lives, don't be so cynical.
I hope he is good and well, i'm sure you do too, right?
He's been posting daily, so that's not the reason
Ideally we'd have someone like @Kaapstad to maintain this thread, as he's unbiased and does an absolutely fantastic job and service to the community, in his various GPU owners/benchmarking threads.
Only so much one person can do though.
Why don't you do it?
I can do that and we can have a leaderboard as well.Think he's just trolling, as you clearly have the top score @Nickolp1974, with a 13900k.
@RavenXXX2 likely won't update this thread as it would put Intel on top of MT, which is a shame. Perhaps someone else with the time and willingness to update both AMD and Intel scores would like to start a new official thread?