I enjoyed my playthrough of the first one but it was very 'old school' warts and all. Story, characters, dialog options were great but the actual combat was passable at best. This is the area that will need some polish/improvement for me to get the next one.
Crikey...the first?Is the first game worth playing in 2025?

LOL so I did...completely misread that, I do apologise @opethdisciple , thats what happens when you try reading (or misreading as the case is !) with one eye on your phone and one eye on your work screen@Tombstone I think you misunderstood - the question was "Is the first Outer Worlds game worth playing in 2025", rather than is this the first game actually worth playing in 2025.

Crikey that music gives me Fallouty vibes
#RTON
What a time to be alive!

Mortismal (very much an RPG player) liked it, he said the companions were lacking a bit but that it was an improvement over the first game and that if you liked the first, you'll like the second.Reviews are out for this now. They seem to vary from 'highly polished but darker and somehow missing what made the original great' to 'better than the original in every way'. It being a M$ published title I assume there's a deal of arselickery going on with some reviewers. I don't do gamepass so would be interested to hear peoples honest opinions when it does release as I think I've decided to wait until the hype blows over before purchasing.
It is indeed, 6pm today and I'm all ready and raring to go. Premium Edition was a no brainer for me with Arc Raiders coming out on the 30th, having this come out on the 29th wouldnt have given me enough time to fully enjoy it before Arc Raiders the next day, so Premium gives me a nice 5 day long chance to bathe in Outer Worlds goodness before Arc RaidersI think it’s out today for those foolish enough to pay for the premium edition![]()

Good good, performance should be good on my albino beast thenPositive news for high end systems (with x3D CPUs)
Issues with RT shadows and denoiser though, needs a patch.

Strangely it looks far better in play than it does in screenshots or even in videosClothes and outfits look particularly good in this.
It shares the originals graphical style, but looks so much better.
Yes it is. Now back to playing itI do love this forum, game has been played by a few people and the only comments are how it runs graphically, from clothes to ray tracing.
Whilst I appreciate the complete lack of spoilers, I really want to know is it fun?

Its still very fallout-y vibe to it. I'll go out on a limb and say that ,due to it still being very similar to the first game , if you didnt like the first one you'll most likely not like the 2nd either.I tried the first game but gave up sharply as it felt too similar to fallout, which is disliked.
I hear this game is supposed to be better. Unsure if I shohld give it a go.
x2 isnt too bad, I barely notice the difference on x2 in games, but x3 and x4 I can definitely feel (especially on competitive games, so I tend to avoid putting it that high)I just started and I couldn't figure out why the game felt absolutely terrible and then I looked into settings and realised frame gen turned itself on, how anyone plays with that on I have no idea
After a claim like that, I think we need to see a videoI can do a passable Alan Partridge
