Rusty and i don't often see eye to eye, but i will give him this, the 290 does kick out a bit more heat than the 780, it pulls more power, especially when overclocked, but its not that different, and you have to look at the specification differences.
64 ROP's vs 48, 512Bit Bus vs 384. its more GPU, that's not saying its faster all the time, though it is a little bit over all, its a different setup with a different idea, the 290 is setup for very high resolution, while thats useless at normal res its part of the reason it sucks up more power.
This is controversial, i may even get beasted for saying this, IMO Nvidia just do enough to give you the competing performance in 90% of situations, AMD tend to go that 10% more. the cost is more power draw, its a price i'm willing to pay for them going that extra mile.
64 ROP's vs 48, 512Bit Bus vs 384. its more GPU, that's not saying its faster all the time, though it is a little bit over all, its a different setup with a different idea, the 290 is setup for very high resolution, while thats useless at normal res its part of the reason it sucks up more power.
This is controversial, i may even get beasted for saying this, IMO Nvidia just do enough to give you the competing performance in 90% of situations, AMD tend to go that 10% more. the cost is more power draw, its a price i'm willing to pay for them going that extra mile.
Last edited: