• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The RX Vega 64 Owners Thread

LoadsaMoney said:
I thought ther Ti was around 70% or more faster.


Pretty sure upon release, they were talking around 60-70% slower than the Ti.
Click to expand...

A Vega 64 Liquid will do about 10-12%~ faster than an AIC 1080. 1080ti is on average 20-25% faster than a 1080 (on a really broad average, but you'll still find many games where a 1080ti is 30-35% faster than 1080 )

A Vega 64 reference would be about 5-8% slower than 1080 (Not 100% sure on this one).
 
So my vega card is back to normal, for those having the same or similar problems as me as we discussed last week.
This is what i did to my pc before i then realised the gpu had completely stopped crashing like it has for months.

Removed Gpu-z (was conflicting with crimson and causing a driver crash)
Changed my ram from xmp to manually setting the speed.
Re seated my ram into slots 2 and 4 instead of 1 and 3 ( something was wrong with slot 1 i discovered)
Liquid cooled my cpu and re adjusted the overclock of the i5 6600k (4.6ghz) changing vlineload calibration to high and making uncore 4.6 also, + cpu flex at 3.5 ghz
Over clocked the ram from 2666 to 2800mhz (just because)

Not sure which of these solved my problem, i would say the ram.
But i am back to running 1700+ and 1130 hbm, no crashes on games at all now with no need to -power limits

I also added 2 extra fans to the 240mm eiswolf radiator to create push pull and never go above 60 degrees at full load now.

Hope this helps someone, and also is a "in your face" to the guy who was saying i broke the card fiddling too much (in a joke way im not taunting you)
 
Illuminist said:
My little 56 will beat any 1080.. post a score and i'll show you
Click to expand...
55919_superposition_benchmark_v1_0_4759_1491962254.png

I just picked the highest score in the bench thread to see if you could as there are no 56's above the 1080 in there
 
pete910 said:
I just picked the highest score in the bench thread to see if you could as there are no 56's above the 1080 in there[/SPOILER]
Click to expand...
My 56 is on a lc bios with watercooling.
I got 4448 with amd blockchain driver (as thats what was installed when i read your post) 1756 1100 hbm
But only get 4112 with the newest driver 1722 1180 hbm
I don't understand how people are getting 5299 on a vega 64 with only 1777 core and 1105 hbm.... it's baffling me. My cpu is clocked higher

https://benchmark.unigine.com/results/rid_79302e77e41145e99f3983042ef88df7
I don't believe it.

I can beat the 1080's though if i roll back to the 17.10.1 driver or whichever it was that was the damn fast one a few months ago. seems like performance from the drivers is going down not up.
 
Illuminist said:
My 56 is on a lc bios with watercooling.
I got 4448 with amd blockchain driver (as thats what was installed when i read your post) 1756 1100 hbm
But only get 4112 with the newest driver 1722 1180 hbm
I don't understand how people are getting 5299 on a vega 64 with only 1777 core and 1105 hbm.... it's baffling me. My cpu is clocked higher

https://benchmark.unigine.com/results/rid_79302e77e41145e99f3983042ef88df7
I don't believe it.

I can beat the 1080's though if i roll back to the 17.10.1 driver or whichever it was that was the damn fast one a few months ago. seems like performance from the drivers is going down not up.
Click to expand...

If someone knows how to run 16:9 Superposition 1080p (like it does on 4k optimized) on my 21:9 monitor, I can try these too. My all out profile is 1750 Mhz / 1180 Mhz.

For reference I get about 7168~ or so post-Adrenalin on 4k optimized.
 
pete910 said:
55919_superposition_benchmark_v1_0_4759_1491962254.png

I just picked the highest score in the bench thread to see if you could as there are no 56's above the 1080 in there
Click to expand...
Here you go...

Ironically, score number 56 at present too.
Vega 56 1709/1090MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920x @ 4GHz
Crimson 17.11.2
gallery_44179_303_497607.png
 
pete910 said:
Lets see then, Need to walk the walk when you say




;)
Click to expand...
Im on it
Still don't know how those 64's get 5100 though, it baffles me.
essentialblend said:
If someone knows how to run 16:9 Superposition 1080p (like it does on 4k optimized) on my 21:9 monitor, I can try these too. My all out profile is 1750 Mhz / 1180 Mhz.

For reference I get about 7168~ or so post-Adrenalin on 4k optimized.
Click to expand...
Thats the same i can push mine too but the scores arent as good as on previous drivers with much lower clocks and hbm..... weird
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom