Soldato
Can I just confirm that the Vega 64 has an HDMI 2.0 port not a 1.4?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Can I just confirm that the Vega 64 has an HDMI 2.0 port not a 1.4?
oh 2 and 2, I thought it was 3 DP and 1 HDMI.Vega 64 has DP 1.4 & HDMI 2.0b. Usually are 2 + 2 on each
oh 2 and 2, I thought it was 3 DP and 1 HDMI.
One of my monitors has failed and the new one has different connectors so I'm trying to work out how I'll be able to connect stuff up.
Annoyingly both monitors are Freesync but only have 1 DP port each. Both also have an HDMI 2.0 port and 1 or 2 HDMI 1.4 ports.
I'd like to connect my Vega 64 to both using DP but my 1080Ti only has 1 HDMI 2.0 port (unless I got that wrong too), so need to connect to one of them with DP, meaning that screen will need to connect to the Vega 64 with HDMI 2.0
Yep.Can I just confirm that the Vega 64 has an HDMI 2.0 port not a 1.4?
Unfortunately my new Vega 64 is still crashing within a few hours of gaming with the graphical errors in the spoiler hidden window below.
My PC is a 2700x, Asus B350 Prime MATX motherboard, a platinum rated 860 watt Seasonic PSU & 2x 8gb sticks of the 8 pack 3200mhz memory running at 3000mhz as 3200 is unstable, My OS is Win 10 pro.
The only questionable component I can see is the motherboard so I've just ordered an Asus 470 motherboard so I can rule out that, I'll rebuild and test the PC this weekend but if the games are still crashing I'll have to return the V64 Red Devil.
Old Motherboard:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asus...am4-ddr4-micro-atx-motherboard-mb-69l-as.html
New Motherboard:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asus...ocket-am4-ddr4-atx-motherboard-mb-6c0-as.html
Send it back mate. We told you from the start. OCUK will replace it.
Even so those are the numbers unfortunately, it might get better with a nitro or a red devil but I don't think we will ever see it really winning by a big margin.Yeah, he got the worse of the non reference Vega 64.
Yeah, he got the worse of the non reference Vega 64.
Always an excuse with AMD....
It is always Microsoft's fault, no matter what branded GPU you having !....... Microsoft's fault
It is clocked a fair bit lower than the other cards in this video.
Steve overclocked the vega and 1080 and found 1080 still faster.
Overclocking the Strix to 1700 doesn't mean the Strix is working at 1700. Most of the time it will be -150 or even more.
I can tell you the Vega 64 Nitro+ (stock cooler) at 1747 has similar perf with the GTX1080 @ 2190 (watercooled). And I have all the benchmarks to prove it because I owned both the GPUs.
So is impossible to lose 5% the Vega 64 at 1700 over the GTX1080 at 1810. The Strix yes, the Nitro or the Red Devil no.
Also if you look at resent reviews of the V64 LC you see it clearly beating the GTX1080 G1 with it's 1835 boost clock.
The V64 LC has clock 1630 same as the Nitro and the Red Devil.
Should I go on?