Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
Dunno yet, 6800 is too expensive.
Bit weird how AMD let nVidia completely off the hook at the $499 pricepoint even if the 6800 does perform better, 3070 demand is gonna be *crazy* now.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Dunno yet, 6800 is too expensive.
Not with RT and no dlss enabled he didn't. Here is some results with highest preset and ultra rt. With no RT the 3090 can't reach 100 fps and with RT well no chance. obviously these settings are higher than the 6800 was run at but over 100 is lala land at 4k. At 1440p yea that's probably what you seen.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/forums/threads/amd-navi2-rdna2-event-thread.18904106/page-27
Bit weird how AMD let nVidia completely off the hook at the $499 pricepoint even if the 6800 does perform better, 3070 demand is gonna be *crazy* now.
Bit weird how AMD let nVidia completely off the hook at the $499 pricepoint even if the 6800 does perform better, 3070 demand is gonna be *crazy* now.
Would that not be where the lower stack comes in? Navi 22/23?
Apparently the original reposter is wrong? Its all in chinese so people take his word for it, this guys says the chinese next report otherwise
https://twitter.com/Vaylion/status/1322566328838844416
the problem is it looks like the 6800 trades with the 3070 but is more expensive. If AMD slot another card underneath it would have to perform almost as good as the 6800 but be a lot cheaper.Would that not be where the lower stack comes in? Navi 22/23?
the problem is it looks like the 6800 trades with the 3070 but is more expensive. If AMD slot another card underneath it would have to perform almost as good as the 6800 but be a lot cheaper.
They could in theory possibly release a gpu with the performance close to the 6800 but without any RT support (unlikely). But whatever they do now it will be too late anyway as most people will have made their decision on the 3070.
For me the 6800 was priced a bit strange unless they are confident it will also compete with the 3080.
I hope the reviewers test them with smart access memory both enabled and disabled.
Rumour has it that humbug is sticking with nvidia.. 2070S![]()
Any update on your upgrade bug?
Had a feeling that you was not impressed by AMD’s pricing.Dunno yet, 6800 is too expensive.
Dunno yet, 6800 is too expensive.
Play the nvidia lottery to get hold of a 3080FE then flog on fleabay for twice what you paid for it, use profit to buy 6800![]()
I think AMD really needed to price the 6800 at $500 the 6800XT at $600 and 6900XT at $700 if they really wanted to shake up the Gpu market but instead they seem to have followed nvidia's pricing structure.Bit weird how AMD let nVidia completely off the hook at the $499 pricepoint even if the 6800 does perform better, 3070 demand is gonna be *crazy* now.
I'd be annoyed if the reviewers tested it with a 10900k or something.sure, people want to see that but on this forum, if the 5000 series of CPU's are truly 15% faster IPC, i can't see many people caring how fast it is with it turned off.
For some reason I thought they were closer.(I know nothing is confirmed until cards get reviewed)That said they are still missing a sub £500 card to compete with the 3070 on price. They've sandwiched the 3080 with 6800 and 6800xt instead.They don't look like they are trading though. The 6800 looks to be a good bit faster and has 16gb vram. This is going by AMD's released benchmarks and i most likely believe them as AMD priced the 6800 above. If it was not a good bit faster i doubt it would be priced so high.
I'd be annoyed if the reviewers tested it with a 10900k or something.
If they just use the 5950x, assuming it is indeed the fastest cpu, then they can just disable SAM for a second run. They'd also have to re test all the Nvidia cards using the 5950x too for a fair comparison and not reuse the older results.Ideally they would have to test with both especially if the 10900K still ends up being faster for nvidia Gpus which can use the SAM.