Yea it is an option in the drivers. You turn it on I think globally or per game.
HBCC is, i don't think the shader thing is an option.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yea it is an option in the drivers. You turn it on I think globally or per game.
HBCC is, i don't think the shader thing is an option.
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-08/radeon-rx-vega-64-56-test/
You will need google translate if you can't read German but they come out and said the HBBC and Primative shaders are not being used! Apparently AMD haven't given a firm date when these features which could have a sizeable bearing on performance will be turned on.
Unfortunately, even if they activate them gamers ain't going to see those cards until they are well weathered by the miners.
Yea it is an option in the drivers. You turn it on I think globally or per game.
They'll be flogging aio cards with empty reservoirs from mining in 6 months
RX580 took 4 months to find it's way into stock and gather bit dust on the shelve, and still prices are sky high, almost twice as much as the RX480 was going for.
With AIB cards due Sept-Oct, we are talking about Nov at best if there is stock and choice for the Vega 64s. And then maybe some prices could come down. After that is Xmas and 2018.
The Aorus 1080Ti Xtreme going to cut through TWW2 and XCOM2 (new DLC) nicely next month
Indeed, most of the sales deluge seems thus far to have been from gamers who wanted a new Freesync compatible GPU at any cost, and professional users who wanted a workstation card and saw that the V64 annihilated the Vega FE and Titan XP on price performance in a whole variety of workloads.Seriously... guys.... the miners aren't some freakin' boogeymen. Anything bad that happens (or you speculate on) isn't automatically because of miners. lol
When is this Navi due then ?? 2019 ??Well, bring on Navi as I can now wait it out on a Fury X AIO lol.
Says the self-confessed minerSeriously... guys.... the miners aren't some freakin' boogeymen. Anything bad that happens (or you speculate on) isn't automatically because of miners. lol
Who knows.When is this Navi due then ?? 2019 ??
Raja mightWho knows.
Ive said it before, if all you do is game, and nothing else, then you want Nvidia, as only they do cards for gaming (their GeForce range), theres no point in AMDs cards, if all you do is game.
LMAO,you can't even make it up - AMD had the cards delayed for months,and can't even get features working for launch.
I mean they couldn't even launch a potato without probably squishing it.
Honestly this makes no sense as if all you do is game you buy a card in your price bracket that plays games. AMD cards game fine and the 64 will most likely get better over time. It's not as straight forward as you think. Sure Nvidia do make gaming only chips where as AMD do an all in one like you say. It doesn't change the fact that buying now a Vega 64 if the price is right will most likely last you longer than a 1080 will. The draw backs are power and heat. Apart from the 2900xt i would say this is pretty much the most lack luster launch i have seen. There is literally no competition for the ti and Nvidia will continue to push prices up and AMD will follow suite. It's disappointing but AMD being back with a bang in the cpu market should in theory give the gpu section a bit more money to burn and hopefully in turn give us competition which should lead to price wars.
I honestly would still pick up a Vega over a 1080 at the same price as history has shown the AMD chip will get stronger whether its a full gaming design or not.
Yep, between the 1080 and the 64 I can see it being a toss-up if power draw isn't important to you, but your argument is that the 64 is a good deal because it will get better in time, the alternative argument is that you could have already had that performance for over a year already, and nvidia is well on the way to the next update which will likely smash vega, despite any improvements in AMD drivers in the meantime. That's why bringing out an equivalent model so much later in the life-cycle doesn't cut the mustard (for me at least).
However, the good part is that at least vega is good enough to keep AMD interested in the GPU market.
Yea the thing is though those that have not bought have to look at the market now. Now that Vega at least competes with the 1080 and are looking for a card now have to weigh up in the present and not 1 year ago. In agreement with it's very lack lustre but you can't change time and for those thinking about an upgrade now can't go back a year and buy a gtx1080. There is now another option and for me i don't really care about heat and power usage as my Haf X doesn't have issues with that. I still won't be touching what i believe between the gtx1080/Vega should be £300 max with the ti coming around £4-500. This gpu market is and pricing is getting more stupid by the minute.
Thing is after using the 1080ti i have a new found respect for there hardware as it's spot on but way over priced when i look back to cards like the 9800pro/8800gtx/1900xtx and even my 290 which cost me £200. No way is the 1080ti worth what you have to pay. Vega has not helped matters either.
Agree with not looking at the past, but that's why I mentioned the future, most people will know that we're more than half way to the next big nvidia update. Personally, if i'd held off this long for vega, I'd keep waiting for volta, unless the freesync issue was biting me. It's a real shame that what I believe to be the main valid criticism of nvidia over the last few years (locking people in with monitor tech), has become amd's saving grace...