Found this review which i think is spot on.http://ps2.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=13761
KNiVES said:If it was a 360 game it would be raped to hell and back.
fdxd said:Resistance is the best console fps out right now. Dont knock unless you played it.![]()
The graphics are its weakest aspect but its still one of the more technically impressive games with large use of physics and effects. Even Epic commented on it being impressive. Especially the later levels. Its weird how the early part of the game looks and how the later parts look. I imagine the sequel will be something really special. The new PS3 Ratchet and Clank game uses the same engine. Not counting the graphics it is the best gameplay on a console fps i have experienced. I am amazed some still think games like Killzone or PD0 deserve mention when games like this are around.
You mean Don't quote swearies like PD0![]()
Bonjour said:I liked PD0. Online Co-op is definately a bonus.
On the topic of this review and R:FOM. Not bad, but I really don't think the graphics deserve a 9.
Totally agree with what your saying. This game is so run of the mill FPS. I'm on the 3th or 4th level of RFOM and I have just lost interest. People do say it gets better when you get past Manchester, but so far it just boring me to tears and I 'm finding it a grind.KNiVES said:I don't get you guys. It's one of the most generic shooters I've ever played on. This review is more spot on. http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=74110
Too many people blinded by new gadget syndrome tbh. If it was a 360 game it would be raped to hell and back.
fdxd said:If you liked PD0 then Resistance utterly blows it away.
wannabedamned said:RFOM is by miles one of the best FPS games out there tho, 1 of the first times i've seen so much going off at 1 given times. WITHOUT slowdown![]()
I have played it, it's not great. Multiplayer is brilliant, single player is pretty woeful.fdxd said:Resistance is the best console fps out right now. Dont knock it unless you played it.![]()
There are no effects worth noting, the physics are simple (and very simple at that) ragdol physics.fdxd said:The graphics are its weakest aspect but its still one of the more technically impressive games with large use of physics and effects.
I wasn't too impressed by the early R&C screenshots either, though I am pretty sure it WILL be fantastic when it's finished. As for now Resistance looks like it was built by a team who have had to rush the game out for launch in America and as a result it doesn't have the same consistency of graphics. Either that or it wasn't made by a very talented team, however I don't think that was the reason as multiplayer really is fantastic and the best I have played on a console in a long, long time.fdxd said:Even Epic commented on it being impressive. Especially the later levels. Its weird how the early part of the game looks and how the later parts look. I imagine the sequel will be something really special. The new PS3 Ratchet and Clank game uses the same engine.
You cannot possibly say Resistance is 1point behind gears of war on visuals. Gears of War is definitely a 10, it's the first game since Mario64 that I have actually gone "wow" at.wannabedamned said:I agree with the review, I'd say the graphics score of a 9 is a little high. Maybe an 8, where as GOW would probably get a 9.