Hi all,
I currently have a D3300 and 35mm 1.8 prime.
At times I find myself limited to what I can shoot.
No wildlife and no landscapes.
I've been thinking of getting a tamrom 17-50 mm 2.8 non Vc to cover the landscape aspect and a Nikkor 50-300mm to cover wildlife.
My question is, is the tamrom worth it over what I have?
Thanks.
I currently have a D3300 and 35mm 1.8 prime.
At times I find myself limited to what I can shoot.
No wildlife and no landscapes.
I've been thinking of getting a tamrom 17-50 mm 2.8 non Vc to cover the landscape aspect and a Nikkor 50-300mm to cover wildlife.
My question is, is the tamrom worth it over what I have?
Thanks.