I don't, nor do I believe I've said I do above. I think we are coming at this from different perspectives; I'm saying it's not as good for mediocre employees even if might appear so on face value (the headline being you no longer have to wait 2 years to get protection, but the reality being decisions get made quicker), not that I think it's worse for 'good' workers/employers if we can get rid of the dross sooner.So .... you want to keep so called "...mediocre, dross..." employees for 2 yrs. Why now?
I think it's tough when people have jobs with patients etc, my wife works in healthcare and feels compelled to do what's needed but everyone has their limits and you've got to look after yourself first and foremost. People sometimes feel a sense of guilt for leaving a job (heck, even going on holiday) especially if they have friends they are leaving behind it pick up the pieces, but you can't let that be a deciding factor.Pretty depressing as all these projects have patients at the end of them on clinical trials which won't happen now.
But it was breaking her, new focus and purpose needed, but job market is obvs quiet atm.
That's pretty poor, at least judged by UK standards. When multiple people are let go I normally expect some form of comms, which can also help to settle some of the uncertainty associated with departures. Radio silence just leads to a lot of speculation and nervousness. Although that said - I've seen it the other way myself with comms coming out very early when there is a lack of clarity about that actual implications with long lead-times to departures.Four people in my team cut, and at least one in our "sister" team. Probably more from my department that I'm unaware of.
No announcements, not even internally - not even my boss has told me about a single one of these and these are my direct team - in fact I found out about two of them at our Christmas drinks on Thursday.
I don't, nor do I believe I've said I do above. I think we are coming at this from different perspectives; I'm saying it's not as good for mediocre employees even if might appear so on face value (the headline being you no longer have to wait 2 years to get protection, but the reality being decisions get made quicker), not that I think it's worse for 'good' workers/employers if we can get rid of the dross sooner.