Thoughts on circumcision?

Jamesdavid3 said:
Am i the only guy here whos had a circumcision??

I'm 22 and had it about 6 months ago due to reasons.., seriously its the best thing ever and no problems at all.

From having it had both ways being circumcised is so much better in so many different ways, im not gonna go into it as its not a medical forum..

Clearly the people who are against it will say all sorts of negative things but they have not got a clue how better it is.
Click to expand...

I see no downsides to how I currently am, and would experience reduced sexual pleasure if I had it done. Thus making it an an exercise in futility.
 
maustin said:
Well there are a few issues/myths here which were discussed in another thread recently. Put briefly, being clean is not that simple as for example HPV load is higher in clean people with a foreskin than unclean without. However, and this is big however that does not directly matter to the person concerned only the people they have sex with. Therefore, ruling out its mass usage by ethical standards. Strangely one of the poorest arguments for circumcision is on so-called medical grounds where unnecessary surgery takes place when in fact all the evidence shows that steroid creams would be more than adequate. Don't get me started on religion in my opinion that is just plain barbaric.
Click to expand...


Where is the sauce for this evidence phimosis is a problem and requires surgical treatment as the (collar) is too tight to extend below the glans which can cause very painful erections.

I was always under the assumption that steriod creams weakened the skin therefore the thin skin on the penis would not be somewhere to apply steriod cream to.
 
krooton said:
I see no downsides to how I currently am, and would experience reduced sexual pleasure if I had it done. Thus making it an an exercise in futility.
Click to expand...

haha thats ALWAYS the one point people make and are so wrong....

There is no reduced sexual pleasure at all, its the same as before only better.
 
Jamesdavid3 said:
haha thats ALWAYS the one point people make and are so wrong....

There is no reduced sexual pleasure at all, its the same as before only better.
Click to expand...

You've only had it 6 months.

Initially, due to the sensitivity of being covered for your life, it will be good, but over time it will desensitise. Guys who have it done as babies are already at that stage by the time they mature sexually, it might take a while for you to get there.
 
krooton said:
You've only had it 6 months.

Initially, due to the sensitivity of being covered for your life, it will be good, but over time it will desensitise. Guys who have it done as babies are already at that stage by the time they mature sexually, it might take a while for you to get there.
Click to expand...

not true.... FACT!
 
krooton said:
Only relevant if you suffer from that issue in the first place ;)

Also, every one of my female friends prefers the sensation of an uncut guy.
Click to expand...

Thats simply because they havnt been with a cut guy..its RARE i guess in the UK but other places its a lot more common

Its the total opposite in America, all the chicks there will take a look at you and say there typical "eeeew" if your not cut.
 
Jamesdavid3 said:
Am i the only guy here whos had a circumcision??
Click to expand...

No your not, tens of thousands of people on this forums - must be a few (including me). I had it done not long after I was born (religious grounds). When I cam over to the UK (at the age of seven) I did wonder why my penis looked so different from others - got really paranoid until I had a chat with my mother lol.

Some people seem to have a slightly odd view on it on this forum. In my experience a lot of people have it done when they are very young so don't even remember. Others either for medical reasons and some through choice - it really isn't as bad as people think. The concept of having a foreskin seems so alien to me (obvousily bias though) :p

With the added bonus of "less risk" to contracting an STI, it is even better. Though I certainly wouldn't like to personally test that theory. Female circumcision......hhhmmm now that does sound a little odd :eek::p
 
Sounds like we need an OcUK investigation into if it is better before of after the cut!

Volunteers?
 
Jamesdavid3 said:
Thats simply because they havnt been with a cut guy..its RARE i guess in the UK but other places its a lot more common

Its the total opposite in America, all the chicks there will take a look at you and say there typical "eeeew" if your not cut.
Click to expand...

Of course they have, they wouldn't be able to have a preference if they hadn't.

I'll try and keep it family lite, but uncut guys are essentially 'ribbed for her pleasure', whilst cut guys are not much different to a plain *****.
 
krooton said:
Of course they have, they wouldn't be able to have a preference if they hadn't.

I'll try and keep it family lite, but uncut guys are essentially 'ribbed for her pleasure', whilst cut guys are not much different to a plain *****.
Click to expand...

Why would you lose the bell from being circumcised?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom