Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by Kaapstad, Feb 11, 2015.
65FPS for a Titan X at stock? My 290X managed 61FPS...
Am i missing something?
TitanXs are better overclockers than 290Xs and Quartz is running his @stock.
Your Haswell based CPU is more efficient than an ivy bridge 3770S.
You are also probably using better RAM with your 4790k as well.
I'm only running 1600Mhz memory. Nothing special.
Well, I triple-checked, and @thebennyboy is correct: I found I indeed had SLI disabled.
2x Titan X SLI Stock
i7-3770S Stock (3.1 GHz base)
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have an appoinment with the Mess Webley.
980 ACX 2.0, 2500k stock
any idea why my screenshot is fully black when i paste it?
Assuming its a Steam game, use F12 to take a screenshot not Print Screen
I used Fraps for my screen captures.
4790k @ 4.7 Ghz, Titan X SLI @ 1350 / 1850 Drivers: 358.50
3440 x 1440
Thought I would upload some R9 Nano benchmarks
4690k @ 4.4 Ghz, R9 Nano @ 1050 Mhz / 500 Mhz Drivers: 15.201 (I think? not to sure how AMD driver number works as I don't seem to have a single xx.xx number)
980Ti @I dunno, it fluctuates between 1455-1507 on this bench. Mem @1753
And on the scoreboard.
CPU: 6600k @ 4.5GHz
Could you post your CPU and clockspeed please.
Posted above as an update to my original post.
Thanks and on the scoreboard.
Sorry Kaapstad, mistake on my part! The CPU is at 4.5GHz. I forgot I raised it by 100Hz
960T @ 6 cores, 4.2ghz.
7870 @ 1257/1400.
15.10 beta drivers.
Nvidia 980Ti Hydro Copper @ 1378/1993
Intel 5930k @ 4.6GHz
Separate names with a comma.